Malik Shabazz (talk | contribs) →WP:ARBPIA alert: new section Tag: contentious topics alert |
Malik Shabazz (talk | contribs) →Edit-warring at Mudar Zahran: new section |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[WP:INVOLVED|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. |
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[WP:INVOLVED|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. |
||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> — [[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] <sup>[[User talk:Malik Shabazz|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|Stalk]]</sub> 03:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC) |
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> — [[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] <sup>[[User talk:Malik Shabazz|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|Stalk]]</sub> 03:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC) |
||
== Edit-warring at [[Mudar Zahran]] == |
|||
You have now made '''four''' reverts on [[Mudar Zahran]] within the past 24 hours. The [[WP:3RR|three-revert rule]], to which I referred above, states than an editor may make no more than '''three''' reverts in any 24-hour period. '''Please self-revert (undo) your last edit to the article''' or I will report your violation and you may be temporarily [[WP:block|block]]ed from editing. |
|||
Please join the discussion I have started at [[Talk:Mudar Zahran#"Influence" section]]. Thank you. — [[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] <sup>[[User talk:Malik Shabazz|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|Stalk]]</sub> 03:54, 31 January 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:54, 31 January 2016
January 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Mudar Zahran. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:25, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
WP:ARBPIA alert
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Edit-warring at Mudar Zahran
You have now made four reverts on Mudar Zahran within the past 24 hours. The three-revert rule, to which I referred above, states than an editor may make no more than three reverts in any 24-hour period. Please self-revert (undo) your last edit to the article or I will report your violation and you may be temporarily blocked from editing.
Please join the discussion I have started at Talk:Mudar Zahran#"Influence" section. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:54, 31 January 2016 (UTC)