64.4.93.100 (talk) No edit summary |
Benhen1997 (talk | contribs) Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Oona King, Baroness King of Bow. (TW) |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
|} |
|} |
||
:Yum, thank you. [[Special:Contributions/64.4.93.100|64.4.93.100]] ([[User talk:64.4.93.100#top|talk]]) 20:25, 29 June 2014 (UTC) |
:Yum, thank you. [[Special:Contributions/64.4.93.100|64.4.93.100]] ([[User talk:64.4.93.100#top|talk]]) 20:25, 29 June 2014 (UTC) |
||
== June 2014 == |
|||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Oona King, Baroness King of Bow]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. |
|||
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Benhen1997|Ben]]<sup>[[User talk:Benhen1997|Yes?]]</sup> 20:07, 30 June 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]], and you did not make the edits, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> |
Revision as of 20:07, 30 June 2014
Talkback
Message added 19:30, 29 June 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 19:30, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you. Though many patrollers are careless at least some apologize. 64.4.93.100 (talk) 19:31, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- I guess I need to pay attention next time when it comes to undoing vandalism. To me I thought it was vandalism. Now I know it was reasonable why you removed that section Wikiquotes from Jim Nantz. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 23:50, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
Thanks for your work supporting the WP:QUOTE guideline, removing miscellaneous quotes that belong on Wikiquote instead of Wikipedia. I checked a lot of your edits and I believe you were right to remove them. BZTMPS ★ · (talk? contribs?) 20:19, 29 June 2014 (UTC) |
- Yum, thank you. 64.4.93.100 (talk) 20:25, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
Your recent editing history at Oona King, Baroness King of Bow shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. BenYes? 20:07, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.