→April 2014: warning |
Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Anca Heltne. using TW |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
* You can also get [http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#wikipedia-en-help real-time chat help from experienced editors]. |
* You can also get [http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#wikipedia-en-help real-time chat help from experienced editors]. |
||
[[User:Aggie80|The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80]] ([[User talk:Aggie80|talk]]) 11:39, 15 April 2014 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline--></div> |
[[User:Aggie80|The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80]] ([[User talk:Aggie80|talk]]) 11:39, 15 April 2014 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline--></div> |
||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Anca Heltne]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. |
|||
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:NeilN|'''<font color="navy">Neil<font color="red">N</font></font>''']] <sup>''[[User talk:NeilN|<font color="blue">talk to me</font>]]''</sup> 16:22, 17 April 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:22, 17 April 2014
April 2014
Hello, I'm EvergreenFir. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Anca Heltne without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! EvergreenFir (talk) 06:34, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Please take out the doping from this article since the athlete won hear case in at TAS (Court of Arbitration for Sport - Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / TAS)in Lausanne against ANAD (the Romanian AntiDoping Acency) since they made big mistake in process of the analyse of her urine samples, she won the case at TAS in March 2011.
Please leave this article as it is now, because she won her case against ANAD (Romanian Anti Doping Agency) at TAS (Court of Arbitration for Sport - Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / TAS) in Lausanne March 2013 because ANAD made failure in the test procedure. Since she is now pregnant with her second child she have also announced official her retirement at the age of 36, after 20 years of sport at a world class level. I hope it is the last time I need to edit this article after you but it back again as before, SO PLEASE LEAVE IT AS IT IS NOW!!!
- Your recent editing at Anca Heltne, which seems to be your only interest in editing here, is disruptive. Do not remove sourced material without a valid explanation, and do not add unsourced material. You are violating WP:BLP, and this is a warning that if you continue, you may be blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:32, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Leventebest/sandbox (April 15)
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Your recent editing history at Anca Heltne shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. NeilN talk to me 16:22, 17 April 2014 (UTC)