Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk | contribs) →Traditions: new section |
Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk | contribs) →List of facilities: new section |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
==List of facilities== |
==List of facilities== |
||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Charleston_Collegiate_School&diff=prev&oldid=600606524 List of facilities]; they have a 1 mile nature trail? Lovely. What does it have to do with anything? Is it discussed in reliable sources? Why should any of this be in here?— [[User:Alf.laylah.wa.laylah|alf laylah wa laylah]] ([[User_talk:Alf.laylah.wa.laylah|talk]]) 15:51, 21 March 2014 (UTC) |
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Charleston_Collegiate_School&diff=prev&oldid=600606524 List of facilities]; they have a 1 mile nature trail? Lovely. What does it have to do with anything? Is it discussed in reliable sources? Why should any of this be in here?— [[User:Alf.laylah.wa.laylah|alf laylah wa laylah]] ([[User_talk:Alf.laylah.wa.laylah|talk]]) 15:51, 21 March 2014 (UTC) |
||
==Segregation academy== |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Charleston_Collegiate_School&diff=600605911&oldid=600605677 Sourced material removed], why? This is sourced from a reliable source. There's no reason to remove it. It's practically the only salient fact about this school. When it's discussed in reliable sources it's because it was founded as a seg academy. It's not OK to remove sourced material without discussion on the talk page. Please discuss.— [[User:Alf.laylah.wa.laylah|alf laylah wa laylah]] ([[User_talk:Alf.laylah.wa.laylah|talk]]) 15:55, 21 March 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:55, 21 March 2014
Schools Stub‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
United States: South Carolina Stub‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Assessment
I have assessed this article for class and importance. The feedback is as follows: Much more ....—Preceding unsigned comment added by Victuallers (talk • contribs)
File:Painting of Charleston Collegiate School.tif Nominated for speedy Deletion
An image used in this article, File:Painting of Charleston Collegiate School.tif, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Painting of Charleston Collegiate School.tif) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:34, 1 May 2012 (UTC) |
Exhibition of mastery
This material; why should it be in here? It's unsourced, promotional, and gives undue weight to irrelevant material about the school.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 15:46, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
List of programs in the lead section
This material, why should it be in the lead paragraph? It doesn't summarize anything in the body per WP:LEAD. It's also unsourced and completely irrelevant. This article is not an advertising brochure for the school.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 15:47, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
List of faculty
List of faculty; why? It's not relevant to the topic of the school. These are non-notable individuals.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 15:48, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Traditions
Traditions; why should this unsourced material be included? There's no mention of it anywhere in reliable sources, there are no descriptions of these traditions anywhere; this is not a school brochure.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 15:49, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
List of facilities
List of facilities; they have a 1 mile nature trail? Lovely. What does it have to do with anything? Is it discussed in reliable sources? Why should any of this be in here?— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 15:51, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Segregation academy
Sourced material removed, why? This is sourced from a reliable source. There's no reason to remove it. It's practically the only salient fact about this school. When it's discussed in reliable sources it's because it was founded as a seg academy. It's not OK to remove sourced material without discussion on the talk page. Please discuss.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 15:55, 21 March 2014 (UTC)