Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Candy Crush Saga. using TW |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::I'm plenty familiar with Wikipedia's policies. One of those policies is that it is bad faith on YOUR part to issue "warnings" for edits that are not patent vandalism (such as walls of obscenities of random blanking). This content dispute is not vandalism and not deserving of a warning. You are in violation of community guidelines. The other editors who disagree with my point of view need to stop asserting ownership over the article and discuss the dispute rationally on the talk page [[Special:Contributions/64.134.237.191|64.134.237.191]] ([[User talk:64.134.237.191#top|talk]]) 22:25, 12 February 2014 (UTC) |
::I'm plenty familiar with Wikipedia's policies. One of those policies is that it is bad faith on YOUR part to issue "warnings" for edits that are not patent vandalism (such as walls of obscenities of random blanking). This content dispute is not vandalism and not deserving of a warning. You are in violation of community guidelines. The other editors who disagree with my point of view need to stop asserting ownership over the article and discuss the dispute rationally on the talk page [[Special:Contributions/64.134.237.191|64.134.237.191]] ([[User talk:64.134.237.191#top|talk]]) 22:25, 12 February 2014 (UTC) |
||
:::Read the warning please. It does not mention vandalism anywhere. --[[User:NeilN|'''<font color="navy">Neil<font color="red">N</font></font>''']] <sup>''[[User talk:NeilN|<font color="blue">talk to me</font>]]''</sup> 22:27, 12 February 2014 (UTC) |
:::Read the warning please. It does not mention vandalism anywhere. --[[User:NeilN|'''<font color="navy">Neil<font color="red">N</font></font>''']] <sup>''[[User talk:NeilN|<font color="blue">talk to me</font>]]''</sup> 22:27, 12 February 2014 (UTC) |
||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Candy Crush Saga]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. |
|||
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. {{Break}}''Here's your 3rr warning''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:NeilN|'''<font color="navy">Neil<font color="red">N</font></font>''']] <sup>''[[User talk:NeilN|<font color="blue">talk to me</font>]]''</sup> 22:28, 12 February 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]], and you did not make the edits, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> |
Revision as of 22:28, 12 February 2014
October 2012
Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Stronger (Kelly Clarkson album), without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Max Stardust (talk) 23:18, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
February 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Candy Crush Saga. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 22:23, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
- I'm plenty familiar with Wikipedia's policies. One of those policies is that it is bad faith on YOUR part to issue "warnings" for edits that are not patent vandalism (such as walls of obscenities of random blanking). This content dispute is not vandalism and not deserving of a warning. You are in violation of community guidelines. The other editors who disagree with my point of view need to stop asserting ownership over the article and discuss the dispute rationally on the talk page 64.134.237.191 (talk) 22:25, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Read the warning please. It does not mention vandalism anywhere. --NeilN talk to me 22:27, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- I'm plenty familiar with Wikipedia's policies. One of those policies is that it is bad faith on YOUR part to issue "warnings" for edits that are not patent vandalism (such as walls of obscenities of random blanking). This content dispute is not vandalism and not deserving of a warning. You are in violation of community guidelines. The other editors who disagree with my point of view need to stop asserting ownership over the article and discuss the dispute rationally on the talk page 64.134.237.191 (talk) 22:25, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Candy Crush Saga shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Here's your 3rr warning NeilN talk to me 22:28, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.