ViperSnake151 (talk | contribs) →Removal of citations: new section |
ViperSnake151 (talk | contribs) Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on CryptoLocker. (TW) |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
Can't you tell that ''all three'' of those citations are citing things across the entire paragraph? Why are you wholesale removing them instead of just moving them? You're being disruptive ''and'' edit warring. <span style="border:1px solid #f57900;padding:1px;"><font style="color:#8f5902">[[User:ViperSnake151|ViperSnake151]]</font> [[User_talk:ViperSnake151|<font style="color:#fff;background:#fcaf3e;"> Talk </font>]] </span> 04:52, 25 December 2013 (UTC) |
Can't you tell that ''all three'' of those citations are citing things across the entire paragraph? Why are you wholesale removing them instead of just moving them? You're being disruptive ''and'' edit warring. <span style="border:1px solid #f57900;padding:1px;"><font style="color:#8f5902">[[User:ViperSnake151|ViperSnake151]]</font> [[User_talk:ViperSnake151|<font style="color:#fff;background:#fcaf3e;"> Talk </font>]] </span> 04:52, 25 December 2013 (UTC) |
||
== December 2013 == |
|||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:CryptoLocker]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. |
|||
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <span style="border:1px solid #f57900;padding:1px;"><font style="color:#8f5902">[[User:ViperSnake151|ViperSnake151]]</font> [[User_talk:ViperSnake151|<font style="color:#fff;background:#fcaf3e;"> Talk </font>]] </span> 04:52, 25 December 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:52, 25 December 2013
Ethan Couch article
Improved enough? --BoogaLouie (talk) 19:15, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- It can't be improved. The article fails WP:BLP1E....William 19:27, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Indian School Of Management
Hello WilliamJE. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Indian School Of Management, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to schools. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:39, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- And somebody came along and CSD it per G11 anyway....William 16:25, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
trailing braces
I have now fixed this error twice. not sure how many more times you made this mistake? Frietjes (talk) 17:19, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Question
Can you link the discussion where the consensus mentioned in your edit summary was reached? Thank you.—John Cline (talk) 03:06, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
aviation lists
As far as I am aware the consensus is to use Template:aviation lists on every aircraft-related article, it was a replacement for not including such links in the see also section. I am not aware that this has changed recently and it appears on thousands if not nearly all aircraft and related subject articles. Intersted to know why you would think differently, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 09:51, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Removal of citations
Can't you tell that all three of those citations are citing things across the entire paragraph? Why are you wholesale removing them instead of just moving them? You're being disruptive and edit warring. ViperSnake151 Talk 04:52, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
December 2013
Your recent editing history at CryptoLocker shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ViperSnake151 Talk 04:52, 25 December 2013 (UTC)