→August 2013: + {{unsigned2}} |
174.6.200.40 (talk) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::It does not appear to be commercial spam. As I said, if you have concerns with the content, you should discuss it at the article talk page at [[talk:Structured settlement]]. |
::It does not appear to be commercial spam. As I said, if you have concerns with the content, you should discuss it at the article talk page at [[talk:Structured settlement]]. |
||
::On a different issue, please review [[WP:NPA]] ... in short, stop accusing people of being paid to keep content on a page unless you have proof. Repeated attacks are likely to result in your account being blocked. --- [[User:Barek|Barek]] <small>([[User talk:Barek|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Barek|contribs]])</small> - 17:45, 12 August 2013 (UTC) |
::On a different issue, please review [[WP:NPA]] ... in short, stop accusing people of being paid to keep content on a page unless you have proof. Repeated attacks are likely to result in your account being blocked. --- [[User:Barek|Barek]] <small>([[User talk:Barek|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Barek|contribs]])</small> - 17:45, 12 August 2013 (UTC) |
||
There is absolutely no need to reference a commercial on an informational page. It is blatant spam. I will continue to remove it as it is unnecessary. JG Wentworth is simply trying to get exposure for their company from this information page. With their persistent re-insertions, it is completely obvious that they are paying people to maintain their reference. Multiple people have complained about this issue. The only reason people would keep putting it back in is due to financial compensation. |
Revision as of 17:49, 12 August 2013
August 2013
Please stop blanking appropriately sourced content on the Structured settlement (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). If you have concerns with the content, take it to the article talk page for dsicussion. Repeated edit-warring will simply result in your account being blocked and/or the page being protected. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:37, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
- Commercial spam is not appropriate content. Previous people inserting that content have had the accounts blocked from editing. That is why it is different people re-inserting the content. JGWentworth is paying various people to keep their commercial spam intact.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.6.200.40 (talk • contribs) 17:41, 12 August 2013
- It does not appear to be commercial spam. As I said, if you have concerns with the content, you should discuss it at the article talk page at talk:Structured settlement.
- On a different issue, please review WP:NPA ... in short, stop accusing people of being paid to keep content on a page unless you have proof. Repeated attacks are likely to result in your account being blocked. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:45, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
There is absolutely no need to reference a commercial on an informational page. It is blatant spam. I will continue to remove it as it is unnecessary. JG Wentworth is simply trying to get exposure for their company from this information page. With their persistent re-insertions, it is completely obvious that they are paying people to maintain their reference. Multiple people have complained about this issue. The only reason people would keep putting it back in is due to financial compensation.