Tag: Reply |
Warning: Edit warring on Languages of Africa. Tag: Twinkle |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:I've explained my reasoning in full. I used the same source as Skitash and the same source used in [[Zanzibar Revolution]] to explain why the horrible massacre happened and the article should be written in the same style as the [[1804 Haitian massacre]] as the events are very similar and the reasons why they happened are also very similar. [[User:HJ72JH|HJ72JH]] ([[User talk:HJ72JH#top|talk]]) 21:05, 11 December 2023 (UTC) |
:I've explained my reasoning in full. I used the same source as Skitash and the same source used in [[Zanzibar Revolution]] to explain why the horrible massacre happened and the article should be written in the same style as the [[1804 Haitian massacre]] as the events are very similar and the reasons why they happened are also very similar. [[User:HJ72JH|HJ72JH]] ([[User talk:HJ72JH#top|talk]]) 21:05, 11 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
:In conclusion, Skitash has lied about what I did, I've explained my reasoning in full, I used the exact same source as Skitash and this is why the report should be withdrawn. [[User:HJ72JH|HJ72JH]] ([[User talk:HJ72JH#top|talk]]) 21:10, 11 December 2023 (UTC) |
:In conclusion, Skitash has lied about what I did, I've explained my reasoning in full, I used the exact same source as Skitash and this is why the report should be withdrawn. [[User:HJ72JH|HJ72JH]] ([[User talk:HJ72JH#top|talk]]) 21:10, 11 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
== March 2024 == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[WP:Edit warring|edit war]]  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Languages of Africa]]. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:Consensus#In talk pages|collaborate]] with others, to avoid editing [[WP:Disruptive editing|disruptively]], and to [[WP:Consensus|try to reach a consensus]], rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. |
|||
Points to note: |
|||
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;''' |
|||
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' |
|||
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Help:Talk pages|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[WP:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to [[WP:Requests for page protection|request temporary page protection]]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be [[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.''' <!-- Template:uw-ew --> [[User:M.Bitton|M.Bitton]] ([[User talk:M.Bitton|talk]]) 00:36, 6 March 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:36, 6 March 2024
December 2023
Hello, I'm Skitash. I noticed that you recently removed content from Zanzibar genocide without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Skitash (talk) 12:54, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- I used the same sources as you and included the reasoning from Zanzibar Revolution and explained that this event is similar to the 1804 Haitian massacre so I'm keeping it in the same style as the reasons for both events are similar. HJ72JH (talk) 20:41, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Zanzibar genocide shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Skitash (talk) 20:41, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Zanzibar genocide. Skitash (talk) 20:41, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Discussion moved to WP:ANI#HJ72JH_reported_by_Skitash
Hi HJ72JH, I have moved the report from WP:AIV to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents § HJ72JH reported by Skitash to allow discussion. Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:03, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- I've explained my reasoning in full. I used the same source as Skitash and the same source used in Zanzibar Revolution to explain why the horrible massacre happened and the article should be written in the same style as the 1804 Haitian massacre as the events are very similar and the reasons why they happened are also very similar. HJ72JH (talk) 21:05, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- In conclusion, Skitash has lied about what I did, I've explained my reasoning in full, I used the exact same source as Skitash and this is why the report should be withdrawn. HJ72JH (talk) 21:10, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
March 2024
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Languages of Africa. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 00:36, 6 March 2024 (UTC)