→Your A.J. Finn edits: Reply Tag: Reply |
NatGertler (talk | contribs) Warning: Three-revert rule on A. J. Finn. Tag: Twinkle |
||
Line 114: | Line 114: | ||
:Your edits, here and elsewhere, focus on sensationalist information, which violates Wikipedia policies. You repeatedly introduce negative edits to Wikipedia pages of persons you appear to dislike (often having something to do with Ireland). The passages you *repeatedly deleted* in this page were well sourced and objective. If you wish to edit the page, please add information, even if it is the sensationalist information you focus on, without deleting the objective information added by others. Wikipedia is a volunteer community and you should improve, not destroy, the hard work of others. [[User:Accura9|Accura9]] ([[User talk:Accura9#top|talk]]) 14:40, 27 November 2023 (UTC) |
:Your edits, here and elsewhere, focus on sensationalist information, which violates Wikipedia policies. You repeatedly introduce negative edits to Wikipedia pages of persons you appear to dislike (often having something to do with Ireland). The passages you *repeatedly deleted* in this page were well sourced and objective. If you wish to edit the page, please add information, even if it is the sensationalist information you focus on, without deleting the objective information added by others. Wikipedia is a volunteer community and you should improve, not destroy, the hard work of others. [[User:Accura9|Accura9]] ([[User talk:Accura9#top|talk]]) 14:40, 27 November 2023 (UTC) |
||
== November 2023 == |
|||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:A. J. Finn]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about [[WP:EPTALK|how this is done]]. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. |
|||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:NatGertler|Nat Gertler]] ([[User talk:NatGertler|talk]]) 15:45, 27 November 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:45, 27 November 2023
Hello, Accura9, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 19:58, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
- Frequently asked questions
- Cheatsheet
- Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
- The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
- Help pages
- Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
CS1 error on The Woman in the Window (2021 film)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The Woman in the Window (2021 film), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:25, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on A. J. Finn
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page A. J. Finn, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. ( | )
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:31, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: End of Story (novel) (July 31)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:End of Story (novel) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Accura9!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 19:58, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: End of Story (novel) (August 3)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:End of Story (novel) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your A.J. Finn edits
I'm asking you to review the Wikipedia:Etiquette guidelines, and WP:PROMOTION, which makes clear that Wikipedia is not "a vehicle for propaganda, advertising and showcasing." The inclusion of publicly available and well-documented information about an individual is not wrong just because it may present that person in a negative light. Reverting edits of mine made elsewhere on Wikipedia just because you have a strong POV about the A.J. Finn article does not help to make your case. --siriaeve (talk) 14:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- Your edits, here and elsewhere, focus on sensationalist information, which violates Wikipedia policies. You repeatedly introduce negative edits to Wikipedia pages of persons you appear to dislike (often having something to do with Ireland). The passages you *repeatedly deleted* in this page were well sourced and objective. If you wish to edit the page, please add information, even if it is the sensationalist information you focus on, without deleting the objective information added by others. Wikipedia is a volunteer community and you should improve, not destroy, the hard work of others. Accura9 (talk) 14:40, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
November 2023
Your recent editing history at A. J. Finn shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nat Gertler (talk) 15:45, 27 November 2023 (UTC)