Favre1fan93 (talk | contribs) Warning: Three-revert rule. Tags: Twinkle Reverted |
Favre1fan93 (talk | contribs) →July 2023: + Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Favre1fan93|Favre1fan93]] ([[User talk:Favre1fan93|talk]]) 17:36, 11 July 2023 (UTC) |
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Favre1fan93|Favre1fan93]] ([[User talk:Favre1fan93|talk]]) 17:36, 11 July 2023 (UTC) |
||
:{{re|ChimaFan12}} You need to stop reverting and discuss on the talk page. I count at least 2 discussions happening about the material you are warring about on [[Talk:Adventure into Fear (franchise)]] and [[Talk:List of Marvel Cinematic Universe television series]]. Keep ''each page's'' [[WP:STATUSQUO]] while the material in question is being discussed. If you continue to revert you will be reported. - [[User:Favre1fan93|Favre1fan93]] ([[User talk:Favre1fan93|talk]]) 17:38, 11 July 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:38, 11 July 2023
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022 on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:30, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:User pages on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment, and at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:39, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Administrators on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Rollback of Vector 2022 on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:31, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Notability (politics) on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:31, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Categorization of people on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy/Petition (May 2023) on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service
Hi ChimaFan12! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over six months.
In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in six months.
You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:
- Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
- Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
- Paste
{{Frs user|ChimaFan12|limit}}
underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month. - Publish the page.
If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.
Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:01, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
July 2023
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Marvel Cinematic Universe television series, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Please do not remove the reliably sourced content, which is against the local consensus, while the discussion occurs. Please remember to be civil and assume good faith, and to avoid edit warring. Trailblazer101 (talk) 21:42, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Edit summary *was* given, none of the high quality sourcing supports Adventure into Fear being included in a list of Marvel Cinematic Universe shows, as it is *not* MCU. See Helstrom consensus. ChimaFan12 (talk) 21:45, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Regarding your most recent back-and-forth reversions at the article, I believe you are mistaken in your interpretation of what edit warring is. WP:Edit warring is when editors are in a disagreement, during which both sides ought to cease editing and let the WP:STATUSQUO before the contested edits remain in place until a consensus or resolution is found. I have simply restored the status quo from your edits, which seemed disruptive as you removed an entire paragraph and section of the article without clear consensus to do so for this article. If an editor is warned and reverts more than three times for their preferred version, that is a violation of the three-revert-rule, and is against Wikipedia guidelines and policy. I highly encourage you to have a centralized discussion on this matter and to cease reinserting your edits to focus on conversing with other editors. Trailblazer101 (talk) 22:22, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- I highly encourage you to get a grasp on what the consensus concluded. We’ll get this sorted out in a way that favors the truth.. ChimaFan12 (talk) 22:26, 10 July 2023
- As you have been told already (in adam's response which you since removed; please do not remove other editor's comments on talk pages, as it is bad form in any discussions), there is no consensus on that discussion. It came to a divide and not everything was agreed upon, though an approach on how to more accurately present the facts from the reliable sources we have was generated and acted upon. Wikipedia doesn't go by how many people say the same thing. That's just not how a consensus is formed. As WP:Consensus states: "
Consensus on Wikipedia does not require unanimity (which is ideal but rarely achievable), nor is it the result of a vote. Decision making and reaching consensus involve an effort to incorporate all editors' legitimate concerns, while respecting Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
" Without reliable sourcing to prove your claims and without taking into account what other editors have stated in regard to their concerns and points on this matter, a consensus cannot be reached to alter what the articles currently state. Trailblazer101 (talk) 23:40, 10 July 2023 (UTC) - Everything I’ve edited has been appropriately sourced. Every discussion on the matter has used extensive sourcing on my part. Consensus was reached. It cannot be stated to be MCU. It can be stated that it was originally intended to be MCU but it is unequivocally not MCU. That was the consensus. ChimaFan12 (talk) 23:54, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- As you have been told already (in adam's response which you since removed; please do not remove other editor's comments on talk pages, as it is bad form in any discussions), there is no consensus on that discussion. It came to a divide and not everything was agreed upon, though an approach on how to more accurately present the facts from the reliable sources we have was generated and acted upon. Wikipedia doesn't go by how many people say the same thing. That's just not how a consensus is formed. As WP:Consensus states: "
- I highly encourage you to get a grasp on what the consensus concluded. We’ll get this sorted out in a way that favors the truth.. ChimaFan12 (talk) 22:26, 10 July 2023
- Regarding your most recent back-and-forth reversions at the article, I believe you are mistaken in your interpretation of what edit warring is. WP:Edit warring is when editors are in a disagreement, during which both sides ought to cease editing and let the WP:STATUSQUO before the contested edits remain in place until a consensus or resolution is found. I have simply restored the status quo from your edits, which seemed disruptive as you removed an entire paragraph and section of the article without clear consensus to do so for this article. If an editor is warned and reverts more than three times for their preferred version, that is a violation of the three-revert-rule, and is against Wikipedia guidelines and policy. I highly encourage you to have a centralized discussion on this matter and to cease reinserting your edits to focus on conversing with other editors. Trailblazer101 (talk) 22:22, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:36, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- @ChimaFan12: You need to stop reverting and discuss on the talk page. I count at least 2 discussions happening about the material you are warring about on Talk:Adventure into Fear (franchise) and Talk:List of Marvel Cinematic Universe television series. Keep each page's WP:STATUSQUO while the material in question is being discussed. If you continue to revert you will be reported. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:38, 11 July 2023 (UTC)