Erenyeager008 (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Canterbury Tail (talk | contribs) →3rr: new section Tag: New topic |
||
Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
I will take care of that. Thanks for your suggestion [[User:Erenyeager008|Erenyeager008]] ([[User talk:Erenyeager008#top|talk]]) 19:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC) |
I will take care of that. Thanks for your suggestion [[User:Erenyeager008|Erenyeager008]] ([[User talk:Erenyeager008#top|talk]]) 19:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC) |
||
== 3rr == |
|||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about [[WP:EPTALK|how this is done]]. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. |
|||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Canterbury Tail|<b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b>]] [[User talk:Canterbury Tail|<i style="color: Blue;">talk</i>]] 20:39, 3 March 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:39, 3 March 2023
Welcome!
Hello, Erenyeager008! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place
{{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:39, 22 February 2023 (UTC) |
---|
|
|
Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:39, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your advice and suggestions. I'll do my best in contributing to Wikipedia Erenyeager008 (talk) 14:49, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
February 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to The Revenant (2015 film), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Prairie Astronomer Contributions 15:58, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
It was a mistake. Thanks for your advice and suggestions. Erenyeager008 (talk) 16:02, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
March 2023
Hello, I'm Miner Editor. I noticed that you recently removed content from Dark Shadows (film) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Miner Editor (talk) 02:54, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
It was a mistake. Thanks for your advice Erenyeager008 (talk) 03:02, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to John Wick (film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Chompy Ace 11:23, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
I will take care of that. Thanks for your suggestion Erenyeager008 (talk) 19:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
3rr
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Canterbury Tail talk 20:39, 3 March 2023 (UTC)