Girth Summit (talk | contribs) →April 2022: add note |
General Ization (talk | contribs) Warning: Edit warring on Cracker (term). Tag: Twinkle |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
For additional information, please see the [[WP:GS/UYGHUR|guidance on these sanctions]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.</td></tr></table><!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --><!-- Template:Gs/alert --> — [[User:Mhawk10|Mhawk10]] ([[User talk:Mhawk10 |talk]]) 21:22, 6 April 2022 (UTC) |
For additional information, please see the [[WP:GS/UYGHUR|guidance on these sanctions]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.</td></tr></table><!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --><!-- Template:Gs/alert --> — [[User:Mhawk10|Mhawk10]] ([[User talk:Mhawk10 |talk]]) 21:22, 6 April 2022 (UTC) |
||
:Hi. Your editing at [[Controversial Reddit communities]] has been highly disruptive. The assertion in the article (that Time Magazine described it in those terms) is factual - regardless of what you believe to be true, you should not be attempting to change that. You need to ensure that any changes you make to articles are supported by [[WP:RSreliable sources]]. Any further disruption in this area will likely see your account being [[WP:BLOCK|blocked]] from editing. Thank you. [[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#006400;">Girth</span> <span style="font-family:Impact;color:#4B0082;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 11:55, 8 April 2022 (UTC) |
:Hi. Your editing at [[Controversial Reddit communities]] has been highly disruptive. The assertion in the article (that Time Magazine described it in those terms) is factual - regardless of what you believe to be true, you should not be attempting to change that. You need to ensure that any changes you make to articles are supported by [[WP:RSreliable sources]]. Any further disruption in this area will likely see your account being [[WP:BLOCK|blocked]] from editing. Thank you. [[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#006400;">Girth</span> <span style="font-family:Impact;color:#4B0082;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 11:55, 8 April 2022 (UTC) |
||
== September 2022 == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hi Caspian Delta! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of [[:Cracker (term)]] several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring policy]] disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable. |
|||
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article [[Help:Talk pages|talk pages]] to try to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Through discussion|consensus]]. If you are unable to agree at [[{{TALKPAGENAME:Cracker (term)}}]], please use one of the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution requests|dispute resolution options]] to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:140;">[[User:General Ization|<span style="color: #006633;">General <i>Ization</i></span>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:General Ization|<i style="color: #000666;">Talk </i>]] </sup> 04:54, 21 September 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:54, 21 September 2022
January 2022
Hello, I'm Mako001. An edit you recently made to Larry (cat) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T) 06:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Standard Discretionary sanctions alert
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 21:00, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
April 2022
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Uyghur genocide. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
— Mhawk10 (talk) 21:22, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hi. Your editing at Controversial Reddit communities has been highly disruptive. The assertion in the article (that Time Magazine described it in those terms) is factual - regardless of what you believe to be true, you should not be attempting to change that. You need to ensure that any changes you make to articles are supported by WP:RSreliable sources. Any further disruption in this area will likely see your account being blocked from editing. Thank you. Girth Summit (blether) 11:55, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
September 2022
Hi Caspian Delta! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Cracker (term) several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Cracker (term), please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. General Ization Talk 04:54, 21 September 2022 (UTC)