It also appears like the article fails to mention that the bill is a part of a much broader attack on public education by the GOP, like the conspiracy theories surrounding [[Critical Race Theory]], as part of a push for [[School Choice]]. [[Special:Contributions/46.97.170.50|46.97.170.50]] ([[User talk:46.97.170.50|talk]]) 09:46, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
It also appears like the article fails to mention that the bill is a part of a much broader attack on public education by the GOP, like the conspiracy theories surrounding [[Critical Race Theory]], as part of a push for [[School Choice]]. [[Special:Contributions/46.97.170.50|46.97.170.50]] ([[User talk:46.97.170.50|talk]]) 09:46, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
:Not exactly sure how not allowing teachers to groom 5-9 year olds and teach divisive curriculum is an “attack on public education”
:Sounds like you’re just trying to project and stramwan [[User:Dyldyl9|Dyldyl9]] ([[User talk:Dyldyl9|talk]]) 17:31, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Revision as of 17:31, 22 April 2022
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles
This article was created or improved during Wiki Loves Pride, 2022.Wiki Loves PrideWikipedia:Wiki Loves PrideTemplate:Wiki Loves Pride talkWiki Loves Pride articles
Sarcasm in tone?
Anyone else feeling like the tone in the final paragraph is not encyclopedic but sarcastic? Likeanechointheforest (talk) 01:02, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Which one? The "Legal Challenges" heading? 46.97.170.50 (talk) 09:33, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Neutrality issues
Supporters of the bill state that discussions about sexuality and gender identity should be handled by a child's parents and not by their schools; DeSantis' Press Secretary Christina Pushaw has called HB 1557 an "Anti-Grooming Bill".
This strikes me as nothing more than PR fluff, and the wikipedia article on the only source for these claims (The Christian Post) does not suggest that it's a reliable outlet anyway.
...pejoratively known by critics (primarily Democrats) as the Don't Say Gay bill.
This is not encyclopedic, in fact, it reads like a bad faith partisan jab against the bill's critics. The Don't Say Gay Bill is WP:COMMONNAME, and should be treated as such.
It also appears like the article fails to mention that the bill is a part of a much broader attack on public education by the GOP, like the conspiracy theories surrounding Critical Race Theory, as part of a push for School Choice. 46.97.170.50 (talk) 09:46, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not exactly sure how not allowing teachers to groom 5-9 year olds and teach divisive curriculum is an “attack on public education”
Sounds like you’re just trying to project and stramwan Dyldyl9 (talk) 17:31, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]