Kuralesache (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit |
FormalDude (talk | contribs) →March 2022: Reply Tag: Reply |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
:[[User:FormalDude|@FormalDude]] editors are also supposed to improve Wikipedia and those stupid fucks have no interest, so here we are [[User:Kuralesache|Kuralesache]] ([[User talk:Kuralesache#top|talk]]) 23:25, 16 March 2022 (UTC) |
:[[User:FormalDude|@FormalDude]] editors are also supposed to improve Wikipedia and those stupid fucks have no interest, so here we are [[User:Kuralesache|Kuralesache]] ([[User talk:Kuralesache#top|talk]]) 23:25, 16 March 2022 (UTC) |
||
::Editors have tried nicely explaining the issue with the tag. You may want to read [[WP:One against many]]. Even if you are right, it is not appropriate to edit war. ––[[User:FormalDude|<span style="color: #0151D2; font-family: Microsoft Sans Serif; letter-spacing: -.5px;font-size:95%;">'''F'''</span><span style="color: #0151D2; font-family: Microsoft Sans Serif; letter-spacing: 0px;font-size:103%;">'''ormal'''</span><span style="color: black; font-family: Microsoft Sans Serif; letter-spacing: -.5px;font-size:95%;">'''D'''</span><span style="color: black; font-family: Microsoft Sans Serif; letter-spacing: -.5px;font-size:105%;">'''ude'''</span>]] <span style="border-radius:7em;padding:2.5px 3.5px;background:#005bed;font-size:76%">[[User talk:FormalDude|<span style="color:#FFF">'''talk'''</span>]]</span> 23:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:28, 16 March 2022
Mansplaining
I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
tag from Mansplaining, which you proposed for deletion. The article includes encyclopedic content beyond what a dictionary would cover. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}}
back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Firefangledfeathers (talk | contribs) 16:35, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions notice
Hi Kuralesache. Please see the notice below about heightened standards of conduct in a sensitive topic area. I want to emphasize the "does not imply that there are any issues" part of this standard notice.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Firefangledfeathers (talk | contribs) 20:27, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Binksternet
I'm with you on the Sexism discussion (Personal attack removed)--109.52.244.252 (talk) 16:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Just want to say I sympathize you on dealing with Bink’s bullshit lmao TheXuitts (talk) 15:15, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
March 2022
Hi Kuralesache! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Misogyny several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Misogyny, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. ––FormalDude talk 23:19, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- @FormalDude editors are also supposed to improve Wikipedia and those stupid fucks have no interest, so here we are Kuralesache (talk) 23:25, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Editors have tried nicely explaining the issue with the tag. You may want to read WP:One against many. Even if you are right, it is not appropriate to edit war. ––FormalDude talk 23:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)