Content deleted Content added
ProcrastinatingReader (talk | contribs) reword. also seems to be creating policy |
BilledMammal (talk | contribs) Clarify when to open RfC Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
*If your question is about [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Due and undue weight|undue weight]] or other [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view issues]], please use the [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard|NPOV noticeboard]]. |
*If your question is about [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Due and undue weight|undue weight]] or other [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view issues]], please use the [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard|NPOV noticeboard]]. |
||
* If an unreliable source is being over-used or spammed, consider the [[Mediawiki talk:Spam-blacklist|MediaWiki blacklist]], where it can be added to the spam blacklist or a revert list for automated reversion of potential good-faith additions. |
* If an unreliable source is being over-used or spammed, consider the [[Mediawiki talk:Spam-blacklist|MediaWiki blacklist]], where it can be added to the spam blacklist or a revert list for automated reversion of potential good-faith additions. |
||
*[[WP:RFC|Requests for comment]] for '''[[WP:DEPS|deprecation]]''', or for '''[[WP:SBL|blacklisting]]''' or classification as '''[[WP:RSP|generally unreliable]]''' of sources that are widely used in articles, should be registered here using {{tlx|rfc|prop}}. As usual with RfCs, consensus is assessed based on the weight of policy-based argument. |
*[[WP:RFC|Requests for comment]] for '''[[WP:DEPS|deprecation]]''', or for '''[[WP:SBL|blacklisting]]''' or classification as '''[[WP:RSP|generally unreliable]]''' of sources that are widely used in articles, should be registered here using {{tlx|rfc|prop}}. These RfCs should only be opened if a source has been subject to perennial discussion. As usual with RfCs, consensus is assessed based on the weight of policy-based argument. |
||
|style="vertical-align:top;padding:0 0 0 0; width:20%; text-align:center;"|<small style="padding:0 0 0 0;">{{nobr|''Sections older than 5 days [[Help:Archiving a talk page|archived]] by [[User:lowercase sigmabot III|lowercase sigmabot III]].''}}</small><br /><div style="text-align: center; border:solid lightblue 1px; background-color:#DFEFFF; font-weight:bold; padding:5px; white-space:nowrap;">{{Purge|''Click here to purge this page''}}<br /><span style="font-size:x-small">(For help, see [[Wikipedia:Purge]])</span></div> |
|style="vertical-align:top;padding:0 0 0 0; width:20%; text-align:center;"|<small style="padding:0 0 0 0;">{{nobr|''Sections older than 5 days [[Help:Archiving a talk page|archived]] by [[User:lowercase sigmabot III|lowercase sigmabot III]].''}}</small><br /><div style="text-align: center; border:solid lightblue 1px; background-color:#DFEFFF; font-weight:bold; padding:5px; white-space:nowrap;">{{Purge|''Click here to purge this page''}}<br /><span style="font-size:x-small">(For help, see [[Wikipedia:Purge]])</span></div> |
||
|} |
|} |
Revision as of 23:31, 8 February 2022
Welcome to the reliable sources noticeboard. This page is for posting questions regarding whether particular sources are reliable in context. | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
While we attempt to offer a second opinion, and the consensus of several editors can generally be relied upon, answers are not official policy. | ||||||
Please focus your attention on the reliability of a source. This is not the place to discuss other issues, such as editor conduct. Please see dispute resolution for issues other than reliability. | ||||||
If you are looking for a copy of a specific source, please ask at the resource exchange board. | ||||||
Additional notes:
| ||||||
List of archives no archives yet (create)
|