206.180.101.2 (talk) →False Accusation: new section |
Calabe1992 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 178: | Line 178: | ||
== Conclusion Jumping == |
== Conclusion Jumping == |
||
QUIT JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS. iMac G3 reverted. [[Special:Contributions/206.180.101.2|206.180.101.2]] ([[User talk:206.180.101.2|talk]]) 14:17, 29 February 2012 (UTC) |
QUIT JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS. iMac G3 reverted. [[Special:Contributions/206.180.101.2|206.180.101.2]] ([[User talk:206.180.101.2|talk]]) 14:17, 29 February 2012 (UTC) |
||
== False Accusation == |
|||
The content is sourced from a quote from Steve Jobs from an interview in 2008. Reverted. Also, Android was NOT the best selling smartphone in 2010- according to records, the iPhone was. |
Revision as of 15:16, 6 March 2012
|
|
|
Request for mediation rejected
The request for formal mediation concerning Global Warming Controversy, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee, WGFinley (talk) 23:11, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
A genuine honour:
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
For enduring me with such good grace. --Djathinkimacowboy 03:20, 2 February 2012 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thank you for your postings at WP:AIV. Bearian (talk) 19:50, 2 February 2012 (UTC) |
- "My pleasure" would be a bit inappropriate, and "my duty" a bit dull. So... you're welcome and thanks! - DVdm (talk) 19:58, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
RfC: Ambiguity about the circularity wording.
DVdm: It appears to me that you have consensus on rewording the circularity statements. Maybe it is time to implement a change? I am sorry that my attempts to change the fifth condition to be satisfied in using primary sources has distracted from this accomplishment. Brews ohare (talk) 13:01, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, it appears that way. I'm going to wait a little while though. There's no hurry, and perhaps someone shows up with yet another take on the matter. Who knows? - DVdm (talk) 15:40, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
- Done. See update. Too bad it didn't really work out the way you would have preferred it. I notice that your wp-article got demoted to essay status now. I still think it could (and should) somehow be incorporated in the main space Wikipedia article, but the opposition turns out to be too strong. Win some, lose some, I guess. Take care. - DVdm (talk) 21:08, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Oops.
Thanks for catching that. (!) Killiondude (talk) 20:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
- It really did sound a bit weird, so I went to check ;-) It's good that you protected the article though. - Cheers. - DVdm (talk) 20:41, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Copyright symbol
No per MOS:TM#General_rules Cheers! Jim1138 (talk) 21:33, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
- Ha... that's a good thing to point to in such cases. Thanks a bunch! - DVdm (talk) 21:35, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
WP policy RfC
Hi DVdm:
Maybe you have an interest in |this RfC regarding policy on articles using primary sources? Brews ohare (talk) 22:55, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Query about finding images
D, I'd like a word of advice if I may. How does an editor determine whether an image may be used here? I'm dying to get a chart in the Birthstones article, and it looks as if I will have to do it myself. Not wishing to seem pushy or in violation of WP:OWN, I just need to know what guidelines Wikipedia provides us when we go hunting for an image. I've tried three editors, one admin, and no one is really responding. The article would look 100% better with a chart that people could consult.--Djathinkimacowboy 05:10, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- The matter seems to be strictly ruled by U.S. law, and I'm not familiar with that. Once, for my talk page archive nav box, I added an image of one of my favourite albums here. It was promptly and automatically removed per Wikipedia:NFCC#9. The image seems to be allowed in article space but not in talk space. I had a quick look at the policy, decided not to bother, and put the books back in place. Perhaps you can do some reading of the policy, and/or put a {{help}} template on your talkpage. Good luck. - DVdm (talk) 08:03, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Taniec z Gwiazdami BEST OF 1-12
Welcome! Please delete this page because it is something wymyśonego. This program has never been on television and never will be. That someone came up with ... Please visit Poland Dancing with the Stars ... Was foolish! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.56.252.228 (talk) 10:07, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
English or Portuguese
I am sorry but in that case we were two Portuguese, talking about one Portuguese footballer and Portuguse sources. Since i think the Vasco's talk page has no interest at all to the Wikipedia users i am sure it was better to talk in Portuguese, so we understand better and do a better job.
Kind regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.168.128.211 (talk) 11:47, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- Please sign your talk page messages with four tildes (~~~~) Thanks.
- I understand, but not everyone takes the trouble to go and verify whether some comment on someone's talk page could have been genuine, nonsense, vandalism, or even a personal attack. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 11:55, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
OK. Thanks for helping and advising me. I now see that the user likes to intercept messages, I think in that case the owner of the page should decide either it is genuine, nonsense, vandalism, or even personal attack. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.168.128.211 (talk) 12:52, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- Please sign your talk page messages with four tildes (~~~~) Thanks.
- I'm sure this is not someone "liking to intercept messages", but rather someone who patrolls for vandalsim. In this case the patroller assumed that the edit added nonsense to the page, as he is entitled to, as this is the english Wikipedia, and the string of characters is indeed nonsense for someone who is not familiar with the language. In order not to waste more time with situations like this, please consider avoiding non-English on talk pages in the English Wiki. - DVdm (talk) 13:08, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- 79.168.128.211 , I'm sorry for reverting your edit as I can now see that it was indeed not vandalism. However, I reverted it for the reasons that DVdm mentioned above, and I agree with his point that one should perhaps avoid non-English talk on this wiki. DVdm, thanks for commenting on the situation in the time I was offline. Metricopolus (talk) 09:54, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
TiME
Hello. You wrote: "DAB-pages are for disambiguation of article names." The article is indeed called TiME, so its mention in the Time disambiguation page is not just granted, but necessary. Cheers, BatteryIncluded (talk) 16:46, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- Ha... when I look at TiME, indeed I see that there is a DAB. It wasn't there when I looked at Titan Mare Explorer. So you were correct. I undid myself but made a little change. Thanks and cheers. - DVdm (talk) 17:12, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you, gentleman. Cheers. BatteryIncluded (talk) 19:39, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
I believe in Hypothermic Needles
Who are you to tell me I can't believe in and share my belief of hypothermic needles, I am an accredited hypothermic needle porfessor — Preceding unsigned comment added by 3chopl0x (talk • contribs) 12:26, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- That is good for you, but I have no idea what you are talking about. - DVdm (talk) 12:46, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- The word is "hypodermic" Dr. Echo Plz. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:01, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Occ Safety Page
thanks for watching out on the Occ Safety page... not sure what that person was thinking with those edits... that pages needs an enormous amount of attention to bring it up to some sort of organized look... I've been chipping away at it recently but there is a manure load left to do... Kurt Dundy (talk) 21:40, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Inquisitor S.'s talk page
Stefan Oswald1 was me, and I just redacted my comment. It was wrong and immature of me to have made that account, and I will discontinue it and post a notice as such on it's user page. --Imperator Sascha (talk) 19:52, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Request for link
In a discussion I had with you on 10,May 2010, You called up Maxwell's article about "atom". Could you please send that link to my talk page so I can find it again easier? Thank you.WFPM (talk) 16:18, 27 February 2012 (UTC) PS I have a copy of the 9th edition EB if you're interested in anything more in it.
- Hi. Is this what you are referring to? I found it here in the history of the talk page. - DVdm (talk) 16:33, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- Yes! but I'm a poor typist and lazy and I was trying to get the link transfered into my talk page where I could find it easier. You experts can't understand how hard it is for us old fuddydudies to manage to function in the ambience of the Wikipedia editor environment. And I'm still thinking about matter and wanted to have that article readily available. I like him mainly because he was ready to tackle anything and to bring forward any information that he had on the subject. Not like today's editorial policy.WFPM (talk) 18:19, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- Okay I've opened a file ([[File:Modified Chart of the Nuclides.jpg]]). Now I can't get it into my sandbox. Do you want to look at it and see what you think? It's got a lot of information for your cognitive thinking process as to the stability interrelationship between the elements if you're interested. Uses Table of the isotopes data. Compares to JWB and just granpa's contributions as well as Chart of the Nuclides.WFPM (talk) 21:14, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Conclusion Jumping
QUIT JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS. iMac G3 reverted. 206.180.101.2 (talk) 14:17, 29 February 2012 (UTC)