Content deleted Content added
Northamerica1000 (talk | contribs) +c |
|||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:<categorytree depth="1">Black Lives Matter</categorytree> |
:<categorytree depth="1">Black Lives Matter</categorytree> |
||
:– <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<span style="font-size: x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 20:01, 4 April 2019 (UTC) |
:– <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<span style="font-size: x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 20:01, 4 April 2019 (UTC) |
||
::A disruptive comment that does not address the reason for the nomination. [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 23:15, 4 April 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:15, 4 April 2019
Portal:Black Lives Matter
- Portal:Black Lives Matter (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Plenty or scope but this portal covers a controversial topic best handled in articles with references. A very recent automatic creation. Legacypac (talk) 06:42, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- Strong Keep There is definitely room for improvement, but I am not convinced that it needs to be deleted and meets WP:POG.-- Happypillsjr ✉ 06:48, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep – Passes WP:POG. References can be viewed by selecting/clicking on the "Read more" links in the portal, which leads to the articles. North America1000 08:26, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- We put refs on the page that needs them - the reader should not need to go hunting for them. This format can not provide the balance needed. Balance is found in a proper article not some snippets. This is similar to the some other controversial portal topics we deleted already. Legacypac (talk) 08:38, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- Comment – In the 2014 discussion at Wikipedia talk:Portal/Guidelines/Archive 7 § References in portals, users were against references being existent in portals. As such, a lack of sources in this present portal does not qualify deletion. The notion of "we put refs on the page that needs them" in regards to portals is a personal opinion, and is not backed by any consensus. North America1000 08:52, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep doesn't appear to have been created automatically and easily passes WP:POG. SportingFlyer T·C 09:16, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- The portal's code contains the text "This portal was created using {{subst:Basic portal start page}}". Subst-ing a complex template is the definition of an automated portal creation. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:52, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- I've checked the creator's contribution log and this portal was not created in bulk. I would imagine most portals start out with the basic portal start page template. SportingFlyer T·C 15:06, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, which is precisely the problem: with this template, there is no intelligent curation, leading to all the issues that we see in a majority of portals. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:37, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- I've checked the creator's contribution log and this portal was not created in bulk. I would imagine most portals start out with the basic portal start page template. SportingFlyer T·C 15:06, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- The portal's code contains the text "This portal was created using {{subst:Basic portal start page}}". Subst-ing a complex template is the definition of an automated portal creation. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:52, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- Comment – Plenty of content available to qualify this portal. See the category tree below:
- (Select [►] to view subcategories)
- – North America1000 20:01, 4 April 2019 (UTC)