8.37.179.254 (talk) No edit summary |
SportingFlyer (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:{{DRV links|Project Pegasus|xfd_page=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Pegasus|article=}} |
:{{DRV links|Project Pegasus|xfd_page=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Pegasus|article=}} |
||
When this page went to AFD five years ago, the result was a merge and I am not challenging that. At the time, there were no secondary sources. Project Pegasus had been included as more or less an easter egg in a few Marvel films at that time. However, since then, it is now featured as a huge part of the plot in the newly-released ''Captain Marvel'' film, and as such it is being discussed in independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], five of which were [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Project_Pegasus&oldid=887410220 added to the article] recently before it was redirected again. There are plenty more sources that come up on a Google search, and there may be more RS articles there that I did not see. Based on item #3 at DRV, "if significant new information has come to light since a deletion that would justify recreating the deleted page", I believe it is time to consider overturning the AFD. [[Special:Contributions/8.37.179.254|8.37.179.254]] ([[User talk:8.37.179.254|talk]]) 17:43, 12 March 2019 (UTC) |
When this page went to AFD five years ago, the result was a merge and I am not challenging that. At the time, there were no secondary sources. Project Pegasus had been included as more or less an easter egg in a few Marvel films at that time. However, since then, it is now featured as a huge part of the plot in the newly-released ''Captain Marvel'' film, and as such it is being discussed in independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], five of which were [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Project_Pegasus&oldid=887410220 added to the article] recently before it was redirected again. There are plenty more sources that come up on a Google search, and there may be more RS articles there that I did not see. Based on item #3 at DRV, "if significant new information has come to light since a deletion that would justify recreating the deleted page", I believe it is time to consider overturning the AFD. [[Special:Contributions/8.37.179.254|8.37.179.254]] ([[User talk:8.37.179.254|talk]]) 17:43, 12 March 2019 (UTC) |
||
*I don't necessarily specifically endorse a six-year-old AfD, but none of the sources on the page that was most recently redirected make any sort of showing of [[WP:GNG]]. I think this should remain a redirect, but don't have any problem if the revision right before the redirect gets moved to draftspace. [[User:SportingFlyer|SportingFlyer]] ''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:top;">[[User talk:SportingFlyer|T]]</span>''·''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:bottom;">[[Special:Contributions/SportingFlyer|C]]</span>'' 18:00, 12 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
====[[:Ephixa]]==== |
====[[:Ephixa]]==== |
Revision as of 18:00, 12 March 2019
11 March 2019
Project Pegasus
- Project Pegasus (talk||history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)
When this page went to AFD five years ago, the result was a merge and I am not challenging that. At the time, there were no secondary sources. Project Pegasus had been included as more or less an easter egg in a few Marvel films at that time. However, since then, it is now featured as a huge part of the plot in the newly-released Captain Marvel film, and as such it is being discussed in independent reliable sources, five of which were added to the article recently before it was redirected again. There are plenty more sources that come up on a Google search, and there may be more RS articles there that I did not see. Based on item #3 at DRV, "if significant new information has come to light since a deletion that would justify recreating the deleted page", I believe it is time to consider overturning the AFD. 8.37.179.254 (talk) 17:43, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- I don't necessarily specifically endorse a six-year-old AfD, but none of the sources on the page that was most recently redirected make any sort of showing of WP:GNG. I think this should remain a redirect, but don't have any problem if the revision right before the redirect gets moved to draftspace. SportingFlyer T·C 18:00, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Ephixa
The original page (before deletion in 2016) was not very good, so it was deleted. Since then, I had re-made the deleted page as a draft and it may now show enough notability to have a mainspace article. This deletion review was recommenced to me by Robert McClenon, who had declined the article for AfC and instead directed me here. Micro (Talk)
- Comment - I have tried to rename this to review the deletion of the article in article space. The draft currently exists and is not up for deletion. I am not !voting to endorse or overturn the deletion at this time. Robert McClenon (talk) 12:20, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Accept - The current draft does make the case that the subject satisfies musical notability criteria 2 and 5. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:36, 12 March 2019 (UTC)