SyrianObserver2015 (talk | contribs) |
Magog the Ogre (talk | contribs) You have been blocked from editing to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war on Module:Syrian Civil War detailed map. (TW) |
||
Line 164: | Line 164: | ||
[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|attack]] other editors, as you did at [[:Talk:Cities and towns during the Syrian Civil War]]. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please [[Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot|stay cool]] and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-npa2 --> [[User:Magog the Ogre|Magog the Ogre]] ([[User talk:Magog the Ogre|t]]<small> • </small>[[Special:Contributions/Magog the Ogre|c]]) 19:28, 23 August 2015 (UTC) |
[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|attack]] other editors, as you did at [[:Talk:Cities and towns during the Syrian Civil War]]. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please [[Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot|stay cool]] and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-npa2 --> [[User:Magog the Ogre|Magog the Ogre]] ([[User talk:Magog the Ogre|t]]<small> • </small>[[Special:Contributions/Magog the Ogre|c]]) 19:28, 23 August 2015 (UTC) |
||
The user had mentioned me in a topic I was not conversing in, the user was accusing me of manipulation to a totally new user, I think he is a big boy and can handle it. The user will not get mentioned of what he is or who he is if he does not provoke it, otherwise it is his own fault.[[User:SyrianObserver2015|SyrianObserver2015]] ([[User talk:SyrianObserver2015#top|talk]]) 22:40, 25 August 2015 (UTC) |
The user had mentioned me in a topic I was not conversing in, the user was accusing me of manipulation to a totally new user, I think he is a big boy and can handle it. The user will not get mentioned of what he is or who he is if he does not provoke it, otherwise it is his own fault.[[User:SyrianObserver2015|SyrianObserver2015]] ([[User talk:SyrianObserver2015#top|talk]]) 22:40, 25 August 2015 (UTC) |
||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''one week''' for [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]], as you did at [[:Module:Syrian Civil War detailed map]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[WP:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by first reading the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Page protection|page protection]]. [[User:Magog the Ogre|Magog the Ogre]] ([[User talk:Magog the Ogre|t]]<small> • </small>[[Special:Contributions/Magog the Ogre|c]]) 23:01, 27 August 2015 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> |
Revision as of 23:01, 27 August 2015
Welcome!
|
Formal mediation has been requested
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Cities and towns during the Syrian Civil War". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 18 July 2015.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 04:46, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Formal mediation has been requested
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Cities and towns in the war in Iraq and the Levant". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 19 July 2015.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 02:57, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Request for mediation rejected
The request for formal mediation concerning Cities and towns in the war in Iraq and the Levant, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 20:25, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:50, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Your edits on the Syria map
You need to provide sources for all changes. Please read carefully the "Rules for Editing the Map" below before editing the map. Tradediatalk 15:55, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
User:Tradedia The edits were reverting edits without sources, where are the sources for the recent changes??? I was reverting the area to the way it was as their is no evidence of change.
- No, the edits you reverted were made with reliable sources. And what about the unsourced edits you made relating to Zabadani, Madaya and half a dozen military bases in Aleppo that were obviously wrong? Tradediatalk 16:30, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
@Tradedia Also the same with At Taff and Sha' arah which was changed and not even contested both of them around 10 days ago, you got a source for that?? It is not vandelism to revert an edit error made by another user, an edit based with no source as well.SyrianObserver2015 (talk) 15:38, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
August 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Cities and towns during the Syrian Civil War, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:40, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Stop pro-government vandalism on the Syrian Civil War Map
Stop pro-government vandalism on the Syrian Civil War Map. You made an edit which changed 3 towns from rebel to government. Granted, these towns happen to be held by the government at this point in time, but you need to actually tell people why the edit was made instead of reverting it without explanation.Pbfreespace3 (talk) 19:06, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- You are wrong Pbfreespace3, the towns of At Taff & Sha‘arah are rebel-held and sources were provided for them. Tradediatalk 16:30, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- I do not know about those towns, and I don't care. However, we need to find out who controls Mahin and Huwwarin. We know according to SOHR that ISIS took them a few days ago, but has the government retaken them? Pbfreespace3 (talk) 19:06, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
@Pbfreespace3 There are no articles from SOHR about Mahin or Huwwarin as of recently, however acording to Al Masdar there were brief skirmishes around half way between Qaryatayn and Mahin I don't see anthing else for the past week or two.
@Tradedia Also the same with At Taff and Sha' arah which was changed and not even contested both of them around 10 days ago, you got a source for that?? It is not vandelism to revert an edit error made by another user, an edit based with no source as well.
Also Mahin has been heavly fortified and should not even be contested the same with Hurwann.SyrianObserver2015 (talk) 22:39, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Notice of sanctions
Please read this notification carefully:
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.
Magog the Ogre (t • c) 19:24, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
No problem I will make edits more categorically for now on.SyrianObserver2015 (talk) 22:39, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
August 2015
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Cities and towns during the Syrian Civil War. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 19:28, 23 August 2015 (UTC) The user had mentioned me in a topic I was not conversing in, the user was accusing me of manipulation to a totally new user, I think he is a big boy and can handle it. The user will not get mentioned of what he is or who he is if he does not provoke it, otherwise it is his own fault.SyrianObserver2015 (talk) 22:40, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 23:01, 27 August 2015 (UTC)