Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:DeCausa/Archive 9) (bot |
Newimpartial (talk | contribs) →Re:AN: new section Tag: New topic |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. {{{{{|safesubst:}}}#if:{{{thread|}}}|The thread is [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#{{{thread|}}}|{{{thread}}}]].}} {{{{{|safesubst:}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|The discussion is about the topic [[:{{{1}}}]].}}<!--Template:NPOVN-notice--><noinclude> [[User:Harry Sibelius|Harry Sibelius]] ([[User talk:Harry Sibelius|talk]]) 03:05, 5 April 2023 (UTC) |
[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. {{{{{|safesubst:}}}#if:{{{thread|}}}|The thread is [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#{{{thread|}}}|{{{thread}}}]].}} {{{{{|safesubst:}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|The discussion is about the topic [[:{{{1}}}]].}}<!--Template:NPOVN-notice--><noinclude> [[User:Harry Sibelius|Harry Sibelius]] ([[User talk:Harry Sibelius|talk]]) 03:05, 5 April 2023 (UTC) |
||
== Re:AN == |
|||
Concerning [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1149985662&oldid=1149983354&title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard&diffmode=source this comment] - I wanted to offer a clarification, since my proposal for WT:MOSBIO isn't based on what I {{tq|really want}} to be able to do - if that were my animus, I would be asking for a carve-out for reverting vandalism to BLPs even in GENSEX cases, since I feel that invoking BANEX 1 provisions to do so could be perceived as GAMING the restriction, and that form of editing is what I feel the most urgency about within the topic area. |
|||
Rather, I am being straightforward and transparent in saying that I feel - as a number of editors acknowledged on "both sides" of the ANI discussion resulting in my ban - that I have institutional knowledge and P&G knowhow that would be helpful on WT:MOSBIO this yearI'll- and that, unlike vandalism patrolling of GENSEX BLPs, is a scarce resource on-wiki. I have already been deploying my P&G familiarity in the recent nationalities discussions there, just as I have discussed P&G constructively on other pages (such as a current discussion about FRINGE [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Can_sources_that_state_that_religious_miracles_actually_occurred_be_reliable_sources? at RSN] and the discussions and RfC that resulted in the current text of the [[WP:SNG]] section, a couple years ago). I am simply offering to contribute to a specific corner of P&G development concerning GENDERID as well - policy development being an area where my contributions have never (to my knowledge) been perceived as disruptive whether or not GENSEX matters were involved. [[User:Newimpartial|Newimpartial]] ([[User talk:Newimpartial|talk]]) 17:27, 15 April 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:27, 15 April 2023
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
World War II and the history of Jews in Poland: Arbitration case opened
Hello DeCausa,
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland/Evidence. Please add your evidence by April 04, 2023, which is when the first evidence phase closes. Submitted evidence will be summarized by Arbitrators and Clerks at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland/Evidence/Summary. Owing to the summary style, editors are encouraged to submit evidence in small chunks sooner rather than more complete evidence later.
Details about the summary page, the two phases of evidence, a timeline and other answers to frequently asked questions can be found at the case's FAQ page.
For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration.
For the Arbitration Committee,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:12, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
We live about 4700 miles apart
...but I still heard your jaw hit the floor.-- Ponyobons mots 21:44, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Posting a coherent reply was completely beyond me. DeCausa (talk) 21:48, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) And now I've been intrigued enough to read it. Wow. I love this place. Harrias (he/him) • talk 21:59, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Leo Frank
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Harry Sibelius (talk) 03:05, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Re:AN
Concerning this comment - I wanted to offer a clarification, since my proposal for WT:MOSBIO isn't based on what I really want
to be able to do - if that were my animus, I would be asking for a carve-out for reverting vandalism to BLPs even in GENSEX cases, since I feel that invoking BANEX 1 provisions to do so could be perceived as GAMING the restriction, and that form of editing is what I feel the most urgency about within the topic area.
Rather, I am being straightforward and transparent in saying that I feel - as a number of editors acknowledged on "both sides" of the ANI discussion resulting in my ban - that I have institutional knowledge and P&G knowhow that would be helpful on WT:MOSBIO this yearI'll- and that, unlike vandalism patrolling of GENSEX BLPs, is a scarce resource on-wiki. I have already been deploying my P&G familiarity in the recent nationalities discussions there, just as I have discussed P&G constructively on other pages (such as a current discussion about FRINGE at RSN and the discussions and RfC that resulted in the current text of the WP:SNG section, a couple years ago). I am simply offering to contribute to a specific corner of P&G development concerning GENDERID as well - policy development being an area where my contributions have never (to my knowledge) been perceived as disruptive whether or not GENSEX matters were involved. Newimpartial (talk) 17:27, 15 April 2023 (UTC)