Reviewer/Article Feedback Reviewer
- ( • view requests)
User:Dssis1
- Dssis1 · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) ( · · · c)
- Hi, it would be a great privilege for me to have the Reviewer rights as I have been editing for a while (nowadays, not as much), and would like to contribute more to Wikipedia. David. S 06:24, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
User:Snacks
- Snacks · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) ( · · · c)
- Would love to be able to help expedite pending changes. I feel I understand the appropriate policies and have shown this through my track record. Think I could be an asset as a reviewer. Thanks! snacks [talk] 19:04, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
- Done. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 23:11, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
User:Ochiwar
- Ochiwar · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) ( · · · c)
- Been doing some reviewing through WikiProject Articles for creation the last few weeks. Would like some feedback to know if what I am doing makes sense. Not having heard anything I take as a good sign though ;) If my reviews are found to be reasonable I would be honored to be added as a reviewer. Thanks. Ochiwar (talk) 10:22, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Not done. I think you may be confused on what this page is for. This "reviewer" has nothing to do with reviewing at WP:AFC. Your reviews there are, passing over briefly, pretty good, although some of the pages could use a bit more organizational work but nothing major. I myself try to work over at AFC, and we need the help desperately so thank you! Definitely keep that up. This page is for requesting the user right WP:REVIEWER, which I think you could use a little more experience before requesting again, mainly just because you're new. If you like, keep up the excellent work and ping me in a couple of weeks and I'd be happy to grant it. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 22:58, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
User:EnglishTea4me
- EnglishTea4me · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) ( · · · c)
- Reason for requesting Reviewer rights EnglishTea4me 17:21, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
I have a solid history of creating content, deleting or correcting unconstructive edits, and reverting vandalism as well as a firm understanding of Wikipedia's policy on vandalism and criteria regarding basic content policies. EnglishTea4me (talk)17:21, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
- Not done Sorry, I'd like to see a little more proof of knowledge about policies. The edit warring on Hawaii at the beginning of this month gives me pause, as well as some of the vandalism reverts. Have you tried Twinkle? It would help you give edit summaries and warn the users. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 22:45, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
User:Warren Whyte
- Warren Whyte · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) ( · · · c)
- I'd be pleased to assist the project by becoming a reviewer and play a small part in improving the quality of WP. Warren (talk) 17:30, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
- Done. Mos def. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 22:46, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
User:CaSJer
- CaSJer · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) ( · · · c)
- I'm interested in obtaining reviewer rights in order to be able to review pending changes while patrolling recent changes. I've been doing a fair amount of anti-vandalism work recently, so hopefully I've shown a reasonable ability to distinguish between constructive and unconstructive edits. CaSJer (talk) 23:17, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- Done. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 03:48, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
User:Tucoxn
- Tucoxn · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) ( · · · c)
- I would like to help expedite pending changes. I've read and understand the vandalism and content policies and the legal policy on copyrights. I've shown that I understand these policies through my editing record. I've also read the guideline on reviewing and I think I could be an asset as a reviewer. - ʈucoxn\talk 00:34, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
- Done. Looks good. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 03:39, 2 April 2013 (UTC)