- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
User:Hemanshu
- Suspected sock puppeteer
Hemanshu (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · · block user · block log · CheckUser)
- Suspected sock puppets
- Wikipedianforever (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · · block user · block log · CheckUser)
- Report submission by
- — Arthur Rubin (talk) 09:20, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Evidence
- [1] (reverting my reversion of Hemanshu's [2]
- [3] (random month combinations in 2009 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views))
- [4] (random month combinations in 2010 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views))
- [5] (random month combinations in 2011 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views))
- remaining edits include complete removal of month tags in 2013–2022, which I tend to agree with, even though some of the tags are specially linked from the headers.
- Hemanshu's similar edits in 2012 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) include 8 October, 27 October, 28 October, 28 October, 28 October, 28 October, October 30, October 30, 30 December, and 30 December.
- Comments
- Hemanshu is now blocked for edit warring on 2012
- WF's first edits were to his monobook, which is now identical to Hemanshu's. Suggest CU, though it admittedly looks pretty obvious to me. Wizardman 18:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree that a block might be considered on this evidence, but since the case is before Arbcom, a CU should be run. The CUs may decline to do a check if Wikipedianforever is already blocked. See my submission at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Hemanshu. In any case, I think the behavioral evidence here is not good enough for an indef. EdJohnston (talk) 19:30, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Conclusions
- Hemanshu has been desysopped by Dungodung by request of the ArbCom pending resolution of an ArbCom motion [6]. Stifle (talk) 20:49, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- He has also requested RTV. Stifle (talk) 20:50, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]