The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Speedy renamed under criterion C2C. The BushrangerOne ping only 23:08, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Wars apart from World Wars I & II are usually prefixed with the definite article. Hugo999 (talk) 23:26, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Don Kirshner albums
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Delete. עוד מישהוOd Mishehu 05:52, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:Rename. The album in this category is on Kirshner Records not on a label called Don Kirshner. However, because there is no article for Kishner Records (only a redirect to Don Kirshner), and little info about the label in the target article, I have no objection to deletion of the category. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 21:15, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As there is no main article for the record label. I'd be willing to keep if it redirected to a larger record label and this was a subsidiary, but to a person, I'm not as comfortable. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:28, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Ancient dioceses
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Most people associate diocese with ecclesiastical government. This category, however, only relates to civil government. They have erroneously been attributed to the parent cat Category:Dioceses in Europe. Laurel Lodged (talk) 18:32, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support rename and recommend a clarifying note at the top. Mangoe (talk) 20:23, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support with note per Mangoe Johnbod (talk) 15:55, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Neither category was tagged; I have added CfR tags to both.- choster (talk) 17:40, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:San Andrés, San Andrés y Providencia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:William Haselden
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Indian Maoists
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Delete. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:36, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:Delete. This category is problematic as the terms 'Maoism' and 'ML-Mao Tse-tung Thought' are strictly kept apart. It is only in recent year that a major stream has begun to self-identify as 'Maoists'. People from the tradition of UCCRI(ML), PCC, CPI(ML), CP Reddy, Liberation, etc., staunchly reject the term 'Maoism'. Categorizing that Charu Majumdar was a Maoist essentially means siding with the CPI(Maoist) is a polemic over history. Soman (talk) 07:31, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Heads of state aviation
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Rename. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:37, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This category has...well, a truly awkward name. Thing is, I really can't think of a better one, so the suggested target is more or less a placeholder at the moment - suggestions please. The BushrangerOne ping only 06:02, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: the category should tie in with Category:Royal vehicles which has subcategories relating to presidential vehicles. Hugo999 (talk) 13:24, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support "Heads of state" covers both royal and presidential so is superior to "Royal and presidential". Laurel Lodged (talk) 18:39, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:United States Fifth Amendment due process case law
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Rename. עוד מישהוOd Mishehu 14:06, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:Merge. I am the creator of this category. It was a mistake. Due process cases should be categorized as due process cases, regardless of whether the operative clause was in the 5th or 14th amendment, i.e. whether the federal or state governments were at issue. The doctrinal differences between 5th and 14th amendment due process are negligible, if they exist at all. Distinguishing between these cases should be done by list, if at all, not by category. Savidan 00:31, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.