The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Delete, sole keep was unexplained. Timrollpickering (talk) 21:30, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Government Companies of Trinidad and Tobago
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Overly trivial intersection, only 3 entries, not likely to expand. Not sure what a "government company" is, as the term doesn't have an article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 19:26, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Songs written by Bill Trader
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Only one entry. Bill Trader doesn't have an article and a search shows that "A Fool Such as I" is literally the only song he wrote. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 11:58, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per well stated rationale.--NortyNort(Holla) 13:01, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Environmental issues with food
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Merge. Two similar categories, no clue how they are supposed to be different or relate to one another, or how to differently categorize articles. 174.46.210.30 (talk) 02:46, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have recategorised the two articles mentioned. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 02:29, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The former is about issues and the latter is about anything else. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 02:29, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
But how does one distinguish between the two? Carbon footprint isn't an "issue"?- choster (talk) 14:47, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom. Ambiguity is terrible in categories. Neutralitytalk 04:37, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom. It's not clear at all to me what is an "issue" and what is something else. Good Ol’factory(talk) 03:04, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.