- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:25, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Pragmatiks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No third-party reliable sources are discussing this software. Asserts significance but no evidence of notability. Contested PROD. NellieBly (talk) 22:15, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:49, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I cannot find any reliable sources to esablish notability. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 12:38, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Clearly promotional, fails WP:NOTADVERTISING. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 17:00, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.