- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tim Song (talk) 04:24, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Development and Peace abortion-funding controversy
- Development and Peace abortion-funding controversy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is extremely biased and appears to be a POV fork split off from Development and Peace (Canada) back in December. While this does seem as though it should merit some attention, it doesn't merit this much, and certainly not in such a blatantly anti-abortion manner. This can be adequately covered back in the main article in a neutral manner, and this fork can be deleted. Hersfold (t/a/c) 03:37, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a POV fork that is unbalanced and out of context. Some of the information might be useful to expand the section in the main article (Development and Peace (Canada)), but not to the point of giving undue weight. Risker (talk) 02:32, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:08, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; a POV fork. We have strong guidelines and policies against such articles. Ironholds (talk) 23:58, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with Risker, delete User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 23:59, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.