- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:17, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Taylor 314ce
- Taylor 314ce (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:PRODUCT. Basically just an ordinary guitar, with no claim to notability and no need for its own article. The article has been tagged for failing notability and for reading like an advertisement since 2013. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 21:58, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Human3015 TALK 22:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Colonel Wilhelm Klink is spot on. Fails WP:GNG and WP:PRODUCT. We have a page about the company, and this ordinary guitar in no way merits its own page. Edwardx (talk) 14:58, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - doesn't meet WP:PRODUCT, and searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show it passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 00:18, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete- 1/3 of the article is a promotion, and no secondary sources to confer notability, so delete. In veritas (talk) 16:07, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.