- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 03:57, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Jackets (professional wrestling)
- Jackets (professional wrestling) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
New, non-notable pro wrestling stable. Prod removed by IP. Provided refs are mere lists of results and links to the promotion's own site. WP:TOOSOON at best. --Finngall talk 13:21, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK 13:30, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK 13:30, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Definitely too soon as the group has only been around about a month. No significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 16:52, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 16:53, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:52, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:52, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:54, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:54, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Not seeing any significant in-depth third-party coverage to demonstrate sufficient notability. As mentioned above, this is probably a case of WP:TOOSOON. --DAJF (talk) 04:56, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.