Welcome!
|
Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Dcpoliticaljunkie's vandalizing edit behaviour.. Thank you. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 23:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the WP:DRN regarding No consensus on UAW RFC. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Elissa Slotkin".The discussion is about the topic UAW Strike Quote.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
andrew.robbins (talk) 19:27, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kristen Waggoner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Farris. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Regarding your ADL votes
I appreciate your interest in the discussion. However, I would encourage you not to speculate on the motives of other editors, and instead focus on the reliability of the source. Therefore, I would ask you to alter your vote to reflect that. Thank you! FortunateSons (talk) 23:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much FortunateSons (talk) 00:19, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Unreliable crypto sources
Regarding Josh Gottheimer, per WP:COINDESK, Coindesk is not a reliable source, and TheBlock.co appears to be worse in terms or general reliability. Please find and summarize according to sources which are both WP:IS and WP:RS. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 02:57, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Per WP:COINDESK, it's not a reliable source for notability and that it may have conflicts of interest when discussing specific coins. Unless you're suggesting that a sitting member of Congress is not notable or that Gottheimer has a conflict of interest with Coinbase, that's not relevant. I have no reason to believe that Coinbase is not independent of Gottheimer and I would suggest you take it to WP:RSN if you have evidence that there is a conflict between Gottheimer and Coinbase. Dcpoliticaljunkie (talk) 12:02, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- I added some additional sources, I think a discussion of his position on crypto is warranted but do worry the quoting is excessive. That said, per WP:ABOUTSELF, using his website to ascertain his own position is fine although we probably have WEIGHT issues given how much his article references his own website and House roll call votes... Dcpoliticaljunkie (talk) 12:13, 14 June 2024 (UTC)