GA Review
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Torchiest (talk · contribs) 19:05, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
This article is very nice, and meets just about all the requirements without major issues.
- It is reasonably well written.
- Expanded a bit, think it's ready. - Theornamentalist (talk) 03:02, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- I believe you are referring to the cover image and the frontispiece, as the others are marked PD-1923. Regarding the cover and frontispiece, this is a result of them technically being derivatives of the original djvu file. Since I have modified the original source file by isolating/rotating/bleaching these images, I have to release them into CC as a modifier, which is only allowed since the original file is PD-1923. - Theornamentalist (talk) 03:02, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- Overall:
Oh, one other issues: is there any reason why the title isn't fully capitalized? I think that, per WP:NCB, we would normally capitalize this article thus: Betelguese, a Trip Through Hell. —Torchiest talkedits 19:10, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- Corrected; additionally, the title appearing throughout the work has been adjusted. - Theornamentalist (talk) 03:02, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Comments
Thank you for the review Torchiest, and the copy-editing . - Theornamentalist (talk) 03:02, 6 October 2012 (UTC)