This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- This review is transcluded from Talk:A World Lit Only by Fire (album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Cartoon network freak (talk · contribs) 09:06, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Soon... Cartoon network freak (talk) 09:06, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- Hi there! I'm very sorry for this review being pushed back so much, but I've been really busy lately with projects, thus unable to do much on Wikipedia. I hope I can get to this in two weeks when my schedule looks better. Again, I'm very sorry but I hope you understand... Greetings; Cartoon network freak (talk) 19:58, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, @Cartoon network freak:. Don't worry about it! Everyone gets tied up with stuff from time to time. My power has been out for a few days, and stuff is generally crazy. So our busyness coincides nicely. Take your time. CelestialWeevil (talk) 22:02, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- @CelestialWeevil: Hi there again! I have read the article entirely today, and if we were to judge only by the quality of the written text, this would become GA immediately (at least). However, point 2 of the Good Article criteria is about being "verifiable". Here is a list of, at least in my opinion, unreliable references the article relies on:
- Hi, @Cartoon network freak:. Don't worry about it! Everyone gets tied up with stuff from time to time. My power has been out for a few days, and stuff is generally crazy. So our busyness coincides nicely. Take your time. CelestialWeevil (talk) 22:02, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Metal Insider (#4) — seems to be simply a blog, no accurate editorial oversight
- Metal as Fuck (#7) — same as above; the text reads in first person, hinting at the possible fact that this is a blog
- Metalorgie (#11) — see above
- RIP Magazine (#44) — see above; alone from the look of thr website we can judge, I think
- Ghost Cult Magazine (#58) — unsure, but ere unreliable; they say they're "professional"
- Facebook (#64)
This were a few examples of information being taken from unreliable sources. As for Last Rights, the removal of these sources would mean a major trim-down of the article and a new structure would be needed. However, I don't see such a change as "minor", and this is why I have to fail this, sadly, 'cause as said it's very well-written. Hope you'll renominate in the future. Greetings and good luck; Cartoon network freak (talk) 19:36, 11 June 2019 (UTC)