This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I've read the article, and made some major changes to it. I've removed some of statements that sound like an opinion or a point of view on the article, to make the article more neutral and less essay-like. I have also added a split suggestion to make a new article called History of Wang Computers. If anyone has ideas to improve the article, discuss here.
I removed the error, but the article is still excessively long, mainly because of statements that make this article feel like an essay. I have already started fixing the article by removing unverifiable, vague statements, adverbs, or irrelevant information.
Thanks for your improvements. I had hazy memories of this company and came in to read the article, and apart from being able to delete one request for an additional source (the cited source had the information requested), got sucked down a rabbit hole of reading and looking for independent high quality sourcing. The article is enjoyable and readable, but not yet encyclopedic. I'd hate to see all of the content vanish, but it really lacks sourcing. Holmwood (talk) 22:45, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]