Volunteer Marek (talk | contribs) →discretionary sanctions: new section |
|||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
تو اپنی عی کی چھوٹ میں پیشاب کرتا ہے <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Trtuyfuyfgytiugiugiu|Trtuyfuyfgytiugiugiu]] ([[User talk:Trtuyfuyfgytiugiugiu|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Trtuyfuyfgytiugiugiu|contribs]]) 09:56, 7 June 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
تو اپنی عی کی چھوٹ میں پیشاب کرتا ہے <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Trtuyfuyfgytiugiugiu|Trtuyfuyfgytiugiugiu]] ([[User talk:Trtuyfuyfgytiugiugiu|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Trtuyfuyfgytiugiugiu|contribs]]) 09:56, 7 June 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== discretionary sanctions == |
|||
{{Ivmbox | image = yes | The [[WP:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has permitted [[WP:Administrators|administrators]] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to [[India]], [[Pakistan]], and [[Afghanistan]]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], satisfy any [[Wikipedia:Etiquette|standard of behavior]], or follow any [[Wikipedia:List of policies|normal editorial process]]. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "[[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision|Final decision]]" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]], with the appropriate sections of [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures]], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This is a non administrator notification, and will be logged as such on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} --> | valign = center | [[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|35px|alt=|link=]] }} |
Revision as of 16:59, 9 June 2015
Welcome!
Hello, PakSol, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! -- Cheers,
Riley Huntley talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 14:15, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Fauji Foundation
Hello PakSol, and welcome to Wikipedia!
I appreciate your contributions to the Fauji Foundation article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text taken from other web sites. As a consequence, I have no choice but to undo your changes.
In addition, that material is not appropriate for an encyclopedic article as it is very promotional. All articles in this encyclopedia must be written from a neutral point of view and material should be verifiable in reliable secondary sources.
I'm not sure if you are affiliated with that foundation, if so our FAQ for organizations may be useful for you, you'll find it at WP:FAQ/Organizations.
If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask.
Kind regards, Amalthea 18:22, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
- Amalthea, thanks for the clarification. So if the same information can be cited through 'other' sources, would it be ok? --PakSol (talk) 18:44, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply! You should keep in mind three aspects:
- The material should be presented "neutrally", like you would expect in an encyclopedia, and not like in an advertising or promotional brochure
- People reading the article should be able to verify the information, preferably in an independent source like a newspaper, but for neutral, basic facts the official website can sometimes suffice as a primary source
- You cannot use copyrighted text, so it must be your own words.
- I would recommend that you have at least a brief look at our policy pages regarding those aspects: WP:NPOV, WP:VERIFIABILITY, WP:RELIABLESOURCE. No need to read them top to bottom, but it helps to get a feel for what is considered important here.
I haven't really read the full content you added, but if you keep the above in mind and your goal is to write an encyclopedic article, not to promote, then I would welcome it if you kept adding material to that article. :)
Thank you for your understanding! Amalthea 19:05, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply! You should keep in mind three aspects:
Try to be unbiased on Wikipedia,Government of India never recognised any trekkers/authors map on Siachen officially
some trekkers and authors viewpoint and their maps was never official position of Government of India and neither it recognised them--Koodfaand (talk) 10:24, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
تو اپنی عی کی چھوٹ میں پیشاب کرتا ہے — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trtuyfuyfgytiugiugiu (talk • contribs) 09:56, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
discretionary sanctions
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This is a non administrator notification, and will be logged as such on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.