Content deleted Content added
DJ Clayworth (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
RexJudicata (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
This is part of a 35 year old Fathers' rights movement and is integral to the cause. [[User:Agwiii|Agwiii]] 17:19, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
This is part of a 35 year old Fathers' rights movement and is integral to the cause. [[User:Agwiii|Agwiii]] 17:19, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
||
:Comment:The text of the [[Constitution of the United States]] is integral to American democracy, but it doesn't belong on Wikipedia. [[User:DJ Clayworth|DJ Clayworth]] 17:23, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
:Comment:The text of the [[Constitution of the United States]] is integral to American democracy, but it doesn't belong on Wikipedia. [[User:DJ Clayworth|DJ Clayworth]] 17:23, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
||
To suggest the UPREPA should not be on Wikipedia is to missunderstand the impact of the document as an active instrument of reform. The Constitution is not the UPREPA and the analogy is spurious. UPREPA is important because it defines critical concepts as we try to end the war on children. The UPREPA is a threat to all liberals. [[User:RexJudicata|Rex]] 18:15, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:15, 1 April 2005
Uniform Parental Rights Enforcement and Protection Act
A proposed bill. Not even worth Wikisource. DJ Clayworth 15:19, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This is part of a 35 year old Fathers' rights movement and is integral to the cause. Agwiii 17:19, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Comment:The text of the Constitution of the United States is integral to American democracy, but it doesn't belong on Wikipedia. DJ Clayworth 17:23, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
To suggest the UPREPA should not be on Wikipedia is to missunderstand the impact of the document as an active instrument of reform. The Constitution is not the UPREPA and the analogy is spurious. UPREPA is important because it defines critical concepts as we try to end the war on children. The UPREPA is a threat to all liberals. Rex 18:15, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)