No edit summary |
Halfman halfthing (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
||
===Comment by Half-man Half Thing=== |
|||
Nothing controversial here and not socking. I'm not participating in the Sheldrake article either. Nothing disruptive here at all. I updated the criticisms of wikipedia page which included a section on Rupert Sheldrake. I removed the word 'pseudoscientist' from his description because it's being used as a pejorative and not how his Wikipedia article describes his professional work. I updated the article to include what Sheldrake speaks about on the BBC interview which is GSoW. Not sure why that's so controversial, it's what Sheldrake actually mentions in the interview and this is notable as Jerry Coyne mentions it too in his article on New Republic. I removed a few 'weasel' words. I updated Rupert's criticisms of Wikipedia also referencing the posting of the [http://wikipediawehaveaproblem.com/ case study] on his site which details the instances happening on his article from an account that was banned there, and criticizes Vzaak extensively ironically enough. Vzaak of course is also the editor responsible for this sock hearing. |
|||
If my edit on that page was so controversial, then remove it. I'm not here to haggle, harass or sock. [[User:Halfman halfthing|Halfman halfthing]] ([[User talk:Halfman halfthing|talk]]) 17:25, 2 January 2014 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
Revision as of 17:25, 2 January 2014
Tumbleman
- Tumbleman (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
02 January 2014
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Halfman halfthing (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
- Despite the finding by five admins that Tumbleman was WP:NOTHERE,[1] and despite that Tumbleman was caught red-handed for sockpuppetry, Tumbleman thinks he was harassed and "bullied" off Wikipedia. After his block, Tumbleman pushed this idea through his sockpuppets, and has continued doing so through Halfman halfthing:
- Alerts users by reproducing their exact signature, including the "(talk)" link when it is present.
- Halfman halfthing:
- Tumbleman (copied from previous SPIs):
- "A fair point Wnt (talk)."[10]
- "A correction TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom - Susan Blackmore does not say"[11]
- "I don't believe Sheldrake isn't or is a parapsychologist, jps (talk), but I do believe"[12]
- "I would like to understand how Barleybannocks has been disruptive on the talk page, Callanecc (talk...I see Barleybannocks (talk) just making argumentation"[13]
- "Do as you will, IRWolfie- (talk)" [14]
- "Really? LuckyLouie (talk), it's strange is it?"[15]
- "Reaper Eternal (talk) Mark Arsten (talk) asked me to contact you directly."[16]
- "LuckyLouie (talk) thank you for stating that"[17]
- "That would be reasonable what you suggest, David in DC (talk)"[18]
- "I need you to walk me through this Barney the barney barney (talk), because"[19]
- "I have a question for Johnuniq (talk)"[20]
- "Ken Arromdee (talk) You make this claim"[21]
- "Thank you Shaynekori (talk) for making"[22]
- Uses single quotes in edit comments.
- Like Tumbleman, Halfman halfthing thinks Guerrilla Skepticism on Wikipedia (GSM) is a big problem (GSM is unrelated to the Sheldrake article; backstory is here).
- Halfman halfthing: [29]
- [From LuckyLouie's AE statement.] Tumbleman appears to be at the center of it, making a lot of noise about working "for the good of Wikipedia" to protect Wikipedia from "skeptics" and something he calls "GSM". His first direct Talk page comment to me claimed I was advancing a "GSM editors" agenda [30]. This prompted my further attention, and I noted a number of his Talk page arguments have included rants against the "groupthink ideological agenda of skeptics" [31], the dangers of a "skeptical POV agenda" [32] and the agenda of "GSM editors" [33], [34], [35], [36]. Ironically, he professes his own neutrality and lack of bias while accusing other editors of bias and organized "GSM" conspiracy [37].
-- vzaak 16:01, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Comment by Half-man Half Thing
Nothing controversial here and not socking. I'm not participating in the Sheldrake article either. Nothing disruptive here at all. I updated the criticisms of wikipedia page which included a section on Rupert Sheldrake. I removed the word 'pseudoscientist' from his description because it's being used as a pejorative and not how his Wikipedia article describes his professional work. I updated the article to include what Sheldrake speaks about on the BBC interview which is GSoW. Not sure why that's so controversial, it's what Sheldrake actually mentions in the interview and this is notable as Jerry Coyne mentions it too in his article on New Republic. I removed a few 'weasel' words. I updated Rupert's criticisms of Wikipedia also referencing the posting of the case study on his site which details the instances happening on his article from an account that was banned there, and criticizes Vzaak extensively ironically enough. Vzaak of course is also the editor responsible for this sock hearing.
If my edit on that page was so controversial, then remove it. I'm not here to haggle, harass or sock. Halfman halfthing (talk) 17:25, 2 January 2014 (UTC)