←Created page with '{{subst:SPI report |checkuser=yes <!-- Please do not enter anything in the subject/headline box! If you want to request checkuser, simply change the line above ...' |
Rschen7754 (talk | contribs) Declining checkuser |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
=====<big>22 September 2013</big>===== |
=====<big>22 September 2013</big>===== |
||
{{SPI case status| |
{{SPI case status|decline}} |
||
;Suspected sockpuppets |
;Suspected sockpuppets |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
||
*{{Decline}} - CUs cannot publicly connect IPs to accounts, which fulfilling this CU request would do. Use behavior. '''[[User:Rschen7754|Rs]][[User talk:Rschen7754|chen]][[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|7754]]''' 01:22, 23 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
Revision as of 01:22, 23 September 2013
The Discoverer
- The Discoverer (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
22 September 2013
– An SPI clerk has declined a request for CheckUser, and the case is now awaiting a behavioural investigation.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
For several weeks I've been involved in a content dispute with User:The Discoverer regarding a number of articles related to the Sino-Indian border dispute. There have already been discussions on the Administrators' noticeboard, on CfD, and on Talk:Lanak Pass. Yesterday I found out that the IP 117.195.122.22 (geolocates to Pune, India) was canvassing on the Indian noticeboard [1], without notifying the Chinese noticeboard. This IP had no previous edit history, but displayed comprehensive knowledge of the dispute which involves a large number of newly-created, obscure articles.
After further investigation, I found that two similar IP's (117.195.96.62 and 117.195.99.85) edited User talk:The Discoverer a few years ago, repeatedly removing warnings and other unfavourable messages that were posted on The Discoverer's talk page (diffs: [2] [3] [4]). This edit [5] by 117.195.99.85 was particularly revealing, with an edit summary that says "Article in question has been deleted and user has read the warnings", speaking as if on behalf of User:The Discoverer.
I believe the evidence above is sufficient to prove that 117.195.122.22 is an IP sock of User:The Discoverer, who was deliberately attempting to hide his identity when engaging in inappropriate canvassing. Zanhe (talk) 23:28, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Clerk declined - CUs cannot publicly connect IPs to accounts, which fulfilling this CU request would do. Use behavior. Rschen7754 01:22, 23 September 2013 (UTC)