Stephan Schulz (talk | contribs) →Suspected sockpuppets: Another |
Stephan Schulz (talk | contribs) →Evidence submitted by ChrisO: Another |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
On the other hand, [[User:ISandert]] is clearly Scibaby. -- [[User:ChrisO|ChrisO]] ([[User talk:ChrisO|talk]]) 01:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC) |
On the other hand, [[User:ISandert]] is clearly Scibaby. -- [[User:ChrisO|ChrisO]] ([[User talk:ChrisO|talk]]) 01:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC) |
||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by [[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] </span>====== |
|||
<!--## Sign below your evidence with 4 tilde characters "~~~~" ##--> |
|||
Another one. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 05:54, 10 May 2010 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>====== |
Revision as of 05:54, 10 May 2010
Scibaby
- Scibaby (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:
Report date April 25 2010, 15:12 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
- Box Matthews (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Fred G. Hall (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Stovl (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Bensome (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Stympkin (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- ISandert (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Virnbaum (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Pliester (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Irrstal (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Sma888 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Hughiefd (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Hestall (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- FullRoomingIn (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by Prolog
The usual. Prolog (talk) 15:12, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
Evidence submitted by ChrisO
I just added User:Stympkin. The editing pattern of this one is odd. It looks Scibaby-like in parts but has some anomalous elements which don't fit the usual Scibaby pattern; however, clearly not a new editor, so perhaps a sockpuppet of someone else? Or maybe Scibaby is changing his pattern? -- ChrisO (talk) 23:51, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
On the other hand, User:ISandert is clearly Scibaby. -- ChrisO (talk) 01:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Evidence submitted by Stephan Schulz
Another one. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 05:54, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
All First four blocked and tagged, but a sleeper check would still be appreciated. Thanks, - 2/0 (cont.) 16:41, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Blocked ISandert as well. Stympkin looks likely, but I am not sure enough to WP:DUCK it right now. - 2/0 (cont.) 04:39, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- Blocked Stympkin and a new one; Virnbaum. Prolog (talk) 17:09, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- Blocked Sma888. - 2/0 (cont.) 07:28, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- Added and blocked Hughiefd; this one might be User:ChildofMidnight (or possibly User:Grundle2600) instead of Scibaby, but they are definitely a sock. - 2/0 (cont.) 07:58, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- Blocked Sma888. - 2/0 (cont.) 07:28, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- Blocked Stympkin and a new one; Virnbaum. Prolog (talk) 17:09, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
- Current status – Endorsed for Checkuser attention. Requested by Prolog (talk) 15:12, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
Clerk endorsed The usual, confirmation, sleeper check, etc. Elockid (Talk) 15:24, 25 April 2010 (UTC)