No edit summary |
|||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
*OK, I ran a quick check--and I see nothing that worries me. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 18:02, 2 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
Revision as of 18:02, 2 December 2023
Aman.kumar.goel
- Aman.kumar.goel (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Populated account categories: confirmed
02 December 2023
Suspected sockpuppets
- 2402:A00:401:7C3E (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools
During a content dispute over the past several weeks at the Divya Dwivedi article, I have noticed what may be behavioral similarities between Aman.kumar.goel and the IP range editor, which if they are operated by the same person, may create an appearance of more support for a position in the content dispute than exists, and may evade scrutiny for edit-warring, for which Aman.kumar.goel has previously been blocked [1] in 2020. The primary similarities I have noticed are 1) the use of the same and similar ad hominem statements during discussions, 2) edit-warring to push disputed content into the article instead of discussing, and 3) reliance on the same unreliable source as support for disputed content.
When recent BLPN discussion illuminated an unreliable source issue, indicating we may have finally found a resolution to the dispute, Aman.kumar.goel responded with what appears to be further ad hominem (WP:FILIBUSTER), which may indicate they believe they have consensus in favor of their and the IP range's view, despite the unreliable source, NPOV, OR, and BLP objections in response to their and the IP range's advocacy to add contentious disputed content to this CTOPs BLP.
Ad hominem
2402:A00:401:7C3E range
Edit summary:
On the article talk page: Talk:Divya Dwivedi#Unsourced contentious content and WP:BLP policy
- 15:59, 13 November 2023 [3] "...Read WP:DEADHORSE."
- 17:16, 17 November 2023 [4] "... Why don't you simply tell how much are you getting paid to censor the information? ..."
- 17:58, 17 November 2023 [5] "See WP:IDONTLIKEIT."
- 07:52, 28 November 2023 [6] "Your wikilawyering is getting more disruptive."
Aman.kumar.goel
At BLPN: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Divya Dwivedi
- 15:52, 1 December 2023 [7] "...Now instead of filibustering, you need to drop the WP:STICK"
- 16:38, 1 December 2023 [8] "...See WP:IDONTLIKEIT."
- 17:28, 1 December 2023 [9] "...But here you are simply out to WP:CENSOR the quote anyhow with this absurd WP:WIKILAWYERING which is not gonna work."
- 17:50, 1 December 2023 [10] "...Why you are censoring the statement?"
- 18:27, 1 December 2023 [11] "... Your entire dispute is based on nothing but WP:IDONTLIKEIT."
- 08:54, 2 December 2023 [12] "See WP:FILIBUSTER." (this is after the non-RS portion of The Print has been discussed)
Edit-warring
2402:A00:401:7C3E range
- User:2402:a00:401:7c3e reported by User:Beccaynr (Result: /64 blocked for a week) filed 17:53, 16 November 2023
Aman.kumar.goel
In the article:
- 10:06, 13 November 2023 [13] "simplify language" (restored disputed content)
- 13:28, 1 December 2023 [14] "nothing wrong with this"
- 15:42, 1 December 2023 [15] "No its fine"
- 15:49, 1 December 2023 [16] "That discussion is already stale" (Aman.kumar.goel had commented in 'that discussion' (BLPN) about this disputed content at 13:25, 1 December 2023 [17], 13:27, 1 December 2023 [18])
- 15:57, 2 December 2023 [19] "Can't edit war everyone"
Unreliable source
2402:A00:401:7C3E range
- 09:20, 13 November 2023 [20] edit summary "The source clearly says "Divya Dwivedi says studies prove Mahatma Gandhi was one of the leaders who constructed the idea of ‘false Hindu majority’ in India."..." - this is the the subheadline of The Print source (the subheadline is not a reliable source, according to the RS guideline)
- 15:59, 13 November 2023 [21] - on the article talk page, cites and quotes the subheadline of The Print ("Divya Dwivedi says studies prove Mahatma Gandhi was one of the leaders who constructed the idea of ‘false Hindu majority’ in India.")
- 07:50, 28 November 2023 [22] - opening comment at BLPN includes citing/quoting the subheadline from The Print
Aman.kumar.goel
- 04:37, 20 November 2023 [23], in the article, adds the non-RS portion of The Print source (the subheadline) to the quote portion of the citation.
Other similarity
In another article talk page discussion: Talk:Divya Dwivedi#Proposal for Selected works section
2402:A00:401:7C3E range
- 08:44, 19 November 2023 [24] "Only books should be there. Rest is entirely unnecessary."
Aman.kumar.goel
- 04:41, 20 November 2023 [25] "Added the mentioned books. I don't think anything else is really needed in that section."
Other notes
After I made an initial draft of this report, and while I waited for confirmation to file a public report, Aman.kumar.goel has filed Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Beccaynr_reported_by_User:Aman.kumar.goel_(Result:_)
Beccaynr (talk) 17:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- OK, I ran a quick check--and I see nothing that worries me. Drmies (talk) 18:02, 2 December 2023 (UTC)