Carolrubensteinesq (talk | contribs) |
Carolrubensteinesq (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*'''Delete''' as an attempt to preserve the soon-to-be-deleted (and spamtastic) [[Scott Walterschied]]. [[User:Graymornings|<b><span style="color:#00CC33">Graymornings</span></b>]]<sub>[[User_talk:Graymornings|<span style="color:#FF9900">(talk)</span>]]</sub> 05:15, 1 January 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' as an attempt to preserve the soon-to-be-deleted (and spamtastic) [[Scott Walterschied]]. [[User:Graymornings|<b><span style="color:#00CC33">Graymornings</span></b>]]<sub>[[User_talk:Graymornings|<span style="color:#FF9900">(talk)</span>]]</sub> 05:15, 1 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
Mr. Vernon I am a member of the New York, Michigan and California Bar and now you are crossing the line. I plan to subpoena Wilkipedia as to your information because you have committed a major error in your accusation |
Mr. Vernon I am a member of the New York, Michigan and California Bar and now you are crossing the line. I plan to subpoena Wilkipedia as to your information because you have committed a major error in your accusation which is actionable in a civil suit. In the spirit of the New Year I will settle for a apology on this page asap. |
||
--[[User:Carolrubensteinesq|Carolrubensteinesq]] ([[User talk:Carolrubensteinesq|talk]]) 05:42, 1 January 2009 (UTC) |
--[[User:Carolrubensteinesq|Carolrubensteinesq]] ([[User talk:Carolrubensteinesq|talk]]) 05:42, 1 January 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:43, 1 January 2009
User:Film09
Violation of WP:USERPAGE; possible sockpuppet of User:Pprice1 and User:Laurenwest99, who unsuccessfully tried to create a page on Scott Walterschied a few days ago [1]. Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:18, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Requested G11 speedy. It's blatant advertising/spamming. // roux 07:21, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOT#SOAP but not G11, declined speedy. Regards SoWhy 11:59, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Wikipedia is not a webhost or a vehicle for advertisement. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 17:05, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete: Wikipedia is not a place to air your spam. Ironholds (talk) 13:05, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
I am a in house counsel for Paramount and am fully aware of Mr. Scott Walterschied. How this article is advertising or spam asserted by these 2 users asking for it's deletion, is without any credibility or substance. It is factually acurate and as such (and in compliance with Wikipedia Rules) SHOULD BE PUBLISHED. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Carolrubensteinesq (talk • contribs) 23:17, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- I believe we can dismiss the above as obvious SPA. Only edit is to this page. // roux 23:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- I've also left a note on the above account's talkpage explaining both WP:N and WP:NLT/WP:DOLT. // roux 23:26, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- And I've left a note about how there is no lawyer on the California Bar named Carol Rubenstein [2] --Mr. Vernon (talk) 01:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- Bwahahahaaahaahaaa. Oh my. I'd ask for a block based on the volume of quacking in the vicinity, but this could turn out to be very funny. // roux 03:23, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- And I've left a note about how there is no lawyer on the California Bar named Carol Rubenstein [2] --Mr. Vernon (talk) 01:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- I've also left a note on the above account's talkpage explaining both WP:N and WP:NLT/WP:DOLT. // roux 23:26, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is not a place for canned meat. Sam Blab 23:49, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as an attempt to preserve the soon-to-be-deleted (and spamtastic) Scott Walterschied. Graymornings(talk) 05:15, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Mr. Vernon I am a member of the New York, Michigan and California Bar and now you are crossing the line. I plan to subpoena Wilkipedia as to your information because you have committed a major error in your accusation which is actionable in a civil suit. In the spirit of the New Year I will settle for a apology on this page asap. --Carolrubensteinesq (talk) 05:42, 1 January 2009 (UTC)