Content deleted Content added
Drewcifer3000 (talk | contribs) |
m →List of Powderfinger awards: striking "Weak Oppose" |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*'''Support''' - I've worked extensively on this list, as have Lincalinca and Spebi, and I believe it meets criteria. I'd be happy to make any requested changes. '''[[User:Dihydrogen Monoxide|Dihydrogen Monoxide]]''' ([[User talk:Dihydrogen Monoxide|''H<sub>2</sub>O'']]) ([[Wikipedia:Editor review/Dihydrogen Monoxide|''Drought'']]) 02:33, 22 September 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Support''' - I've worked extensively on this list, as have Lincalinca and Spebi, and I believe it meets criteria. I'd be happy to make any requested changes. '''[[User:Dihydrogen Monoxide|Dihydrogen Monoxide]]''' ([[User talk:Dihydrogen Monoxide|''H<sub>2</sub>O'']]) ([[Wikipedia:Editor review/Dihydrogen Monoxide|''Drought'']]) 02:33, 22 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support''', I too believe that the article meets all of the criteria. [[User:Spebi|<b><font color="mediumblue">''Sebi''</font></b>]] <sub color="royalblue">[[User_talk:Spebi|[talk]]]</sub> 05:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Support''', I too believe that the article meets all of the criteria. [[User:Spebi|<b><font color="mediumblue">''Sebi''</font></b>]] <sub color="royalblue">[[User_talk:Spebi|[talk]]]</sub> 05:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Weak Oppose''' Everything looks good except the lead. It doesn't summarize the list/article at all, just gives a quick historical account. In fact, the only instance of the word "award" in the lead is in "This is a comprehensive listing of awards." If you can address that I'd be happy to give my support. [[User:Drewcifer3000|Drewcifer]] 19:24, 22 September 2007 (UTC) |
*<s>'''Weak Oppose'''</s> Everything looks good except the lead. It doesn't summarize the list/article at all, just gives a quick historical account. In fact, the only instance of the word "award" in the lead is in "This is a comprehensive listing of awards." If you can address that I'd be happy to give my support. [[User:Drewcifer3000|Drewcifer]] 19:24, 22 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
*:I merged the History section into the lead. How does it look now? [[User:Spebi|<b><font color="mediumblue">''Sebi''</font></b>]] <sub color="royalblue">[[User_talk:Spebi|[talk]]]</sub> 22:05, 22 September 2007 (UTC) |
*:I merged the History section into the lead. How does it look now? [[User:Spebi|<b><font color="mediumblue">''Sebi''</font></b>]] <sub color="royalblue">[[User_talk:Spebi|[talk]]]</sub> 22:05, 22 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
*::You read my mind! That's exactly what I was thinking. Other than that, there's a few minor prose/copyedit issues I see, mostly because of awkward wording. |
*::You read my mind! That's exactly what I was thinking. Other than that, there's a few minor prose/copyedit issues I see, mostly because of awkward wording. |
Revision as of 01:14, 23 September 2007
List of Powderfinger awards
Nominating List of Powderfinger awards as article factually accurate, contains well presented and documented information and is well written and referenced. —Preceding unsigned comment added by lincalinca (talk • contribs)
- Support. --lincalinca 08:24, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support - I've worked extensively on this list, as have Lincalinca and Spebi, and I believe it meets criteria. I'd be happy to make any requested changes. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) (Drought) 02:33, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support, I too believe that the article meets all of the criteria. Sebi [talk] 05:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Weak OpposeEverything looks good except the lead. It doesn't summarize the list/article at all, just gives a quick historical account. In fact, the only instance of the word "award" in the lead is in "This is a comprehensive listing of awards." If you can address that I'd be happy to give my support. Drewcifer 19:24, 22 September 2007 (UTC)- I merged the History section into the lead. How does it look now? Sebi [talk] 22:05, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- You read my mind! That's exactly what I was thinking. Other than that, there's a few minor prose/copyedit issues I see, mostly because of awkward wording.
- I would sugest changing "The group has also topped the Triple J Hottest 100 chart twice with nineteen entries in the list in total." to "The group has also topped the Triple J Hottest 100 chart twice with a total of nineteen entries." (more succinct, reads better)
- Also "Furthermore, the group has received three..." to "The group has also received three..." (Furthermore is an argumentative word, so it should be avoided)
- You should spell out any acronyms (such as ARIA) at least once.
- And "In Australia, Powderfinger has won fifteen ARIA Awards from twenty-three nominations" to "Powderfinger has won fifteen ARIA Awards from twenty-three nominations." (It's redundant to say "in Australia" since it's an Australian award.)
- Again, if you can take care of those I'd be happy to give my support. (you didn't think you'd get off that easy did you? =) ) Drewcifer 22:19, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Done. Any other obvious problems? Sebi [talk] 00:57, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- All issues have been addressed - I went and spelt out ARIA the first time it's mentioned too, and everything else looks OK. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 01:05, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- Done. Any other obvious problems? Sebi [talk] 00:57, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- You read my mind! That's exactly what I was thinking. Other than that, there's a few minor prose/copyedit issues I see, mostly because of awkward wording.
- I merged the History section into the lead. How does it look now? Sebi [talk] 22:05, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support Looks good to me! All my suggestions have been implemented. Good work. Drewcifer 01:08, 23 September 2007 (UTC)