Content deleted Content added
+1 |
Daniel Case (talk | contribs) →Tim Neumark: delete |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*'''Delete''': No real WP:RS. Seems to be vanity article. [[User:Carolmooredc|CarolMooreDC]] ([[User talk:Carolmooredc|talk]]) 15:55, 9 February 2011 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''': No real WP:RS. Seems to be vanity article. [[User:Carolmooredc|CarolMooreDC]] ([[User talk:Carolmooredc|talk]]) 15:55, 9 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bands and musicians|list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:56, 9 February 2011 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bands and musicians|list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:56, 9 February 2011 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Delete''', level of success does not yet seem to be enough to meet [[WP:MUSICBIO]]. It has been suggested that this is a vanity article by [[User:Timneu22]] via a sock, which would not help it much either. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 16:17, 9 February 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:17, 9 February 2011
Tim Neumark
- Tim Neumark (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails notability; no significant coverage in independent third-party reliable sources. Sources cited seem to be essentially blogs. JN466 10:28, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Keep the article because this is a notable musician. None of the sources are blogs, and they are all unrelated. How could they not be independent? Pianette7 (talk) 14:45, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- As far as I can tell, all the references are to self-published sources: http://neumarkmusic.com/about.html http://www.quiescencemusic.com/ http://www.piano-heaven.co.uk/ http://homepage.mac.com/kathyparsonspiano/timneumark/Personal837.html The following site is a commercial site, but it fails verification: http://payplay.fm/genre/solo+instrumental – there is no reference to Neumark on it. The artist's music, too, is self-published. His youtube channel has 125 views. In summary, there are no professionally published sources whatsoever, and no other evidence of notability. It's the piano equivalent of a garage band.
- Looking at your edit history, a substantial number of your edits appear focused on Neumark and the music he likes. [1] [2] [3] [4]
- Your first edits do not seem like those of a novice editor. Have you ever edited Wikipedia under another user name? --JN466 15:27, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- Delete: No real WP:RS. Seems to be vanity article. CarolMooreDC (talk) 15:55, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:56, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- Delete, level of success does not yet seem to be enough to meet WP:MUSICBIO. It has been suggested that this is a vanity article by User:Timneu22 via a sock, which would not help it much either. Daniel Case (talk) 16:17, 9 February 2011 (UTC)