Content deleted Content added
Sa.vakilian (talk | contribs) →[[Militant Islam]]: I voted |
|||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
**'''Comment'''- Sefringle, please see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Militant_Islam&diff=115212327&oldid=115181898 this], which may be a reason there isn't that much content. --<font color="red">[[User:Kirbytime|Ķĩřβȳ]]</font><font color="green">[[Islam|♥]]</font><font color="pink">[[User_talk:Kirbytime|Ťįɱé]]</font><font color="blue">[[Special:Contributions/Kirbytime|Ø]]</font> 02:49, 15 March 2007 (UTC) |
**'''Comment'''- Sefringle, please see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Militant_Islam&diff=115212327&oldid=115181898 this], which may be a reason there isn't that much content. --<font color="red">[[User:Kirbytime|Ķĩřβȳ]]</font><font color="green">[[Islam|♥]]</font><font color="pink">[[User_talk:Kirbytime|Ťįɱé]]</font><font color="blue">[[Special:Contributions/Kirbytime|Ø]]</font> 02:49, 15 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' This article is an original research article and against wikipedia policy.{{Sa.vakilian}}--12:17, 15 March 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' This article is an original research article and against wikipedia policy.{{Sa.vakilian}}--12:17, 15 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' Referenced article about highly notable topic in world politics. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 19:30, 15 March 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:30, 15 March 2007
Militant Islam
- Militant Islam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
POV fork of Islamism and Islam as a political movement and Islamic extremist terrorism. Totally unsourced. Ķĩřβȳ♥ŤįɱéØ 22:57, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Note: Previous afd: Talk:Militant_Islam/Delete September 18 2003.--Ķĩřβȳ♥ŤįɱéØ 01:53, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Note2: User Bless sins has removed all the unsourced information from the article. --Ķĩřβȳ♥ŤįɱéØ 02:49, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- COMMENT: That constitute as blanking. Luckily it was reverted. In the future please use "citation needed" tag.
- Note: Previous afd: Talk:Militant_Islam/Delete September 18 2003.--Ķĩřβȳ♥ŤįɱéØ 01:53, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. The above "vote" is from the AFD starter. George Leung 00:07, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - You have to be kidding. This is a lengthy, well-written article on a phrase that is commonly used in English-language, western media. If it's poorly sourced then it needs sourcing, not deletion. - Richard Cavell 23:00, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Merge. This concept is already covered by the articles mentioned by the nominator. Content from this essay should be transferred to one or several of those articles. Stebbins 23:09, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Seems to be a very well established article, possibly in need of a few more references, possibly not. Cloveoil 23:34, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep.Very informative article.Biophys 00:10, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Neutral. As the contributor is a Muslim herself, both the article AND AFD nominator may be treading on WP:NPOV, WP:POINT, and/or WP:NOT#SOAP. Both have pointed out valid reasons, and seems to present it in a professional manner. Thus, as of now, i will just comment and be neutral. George Leung 00:17, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep: This is a great article with interesting content, which is separate from all those other 3 articles. Merging would make other articles unwieldy but I agree, its lacking sources and that should be the first step before nominating it for deletion. I believe nominator Kirbytime has engaged in vote stacking for this nomination ([1], [2], [3]) by contacting other users having a favourable opinion of Islam and informing them of this deletion. --Matt57 00:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- comment I found those users by looking at the history of the page and finding the most recent contributors (not vandalism reverters, however). And having a "favorable" opinion of Islam is not against Wikipedia policy. Matt, if you can find any more users who have edited this article and are willing to engage in this afd, by all means invite them. --Ķĩřβȳ♥ŤįɱéØ 01:53, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: How come you dont know that you're not supposed to 'vote' for your own AFD? And no, I'm not going to vote stack like you. --Matt57 02:08, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- comment I found those users by looking at the history of the page and finding the most recent contributors (not vandalism reverters, however). And having a "favorable" opinion of Islam is not against Wikipedia policy. Matt, if you can find any more users who have edited this article and are willing to engage in this afd, by all means invite them. --Ķĩřβȳ♥ŤįɱéØ 01:53, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletions. --Matt57 00:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete/Merge. Really this content isn't at all different from the article to which the merger is proposed.Bless sins 01:11, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- The entire article doesn't contain a single source.Bless sins 01:13, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- COMMENT This user had blanked the page instead of using the "citation needed" tag in a recent edit. Also one of those User:Kirbytime had contacted, for possible vote stacking as mentioned by User:Matt57 (see here:[4]).George Leung 07:17, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Very weak delete per complete lack of sources
and content.--Sefringle 02:47, 15 March 2007 (UTC) - Delete This article is an original research article and against wikipedia policy.Template:Sa.vakilian--12:17, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Referenced article about highly notable topic in world politics. Edison 19:30, 15 March 2007 (UTC)