Content deleted Content added
Judgesurreal777 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
comment |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
**[http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=trivia+encyclopedia Trivia is encyclopedic] and ''Wikipedia'' is not paper. Sincerely, --<font face="Times New Roman">[[User:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles|<span style="color:#009">Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles|Tally-ho!]]''</sup> 02:40, 20 May 2008 (UTC) |
**[http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=trivia+encyclopedia Trivia is encyclopedic] and ''Wikipedia'' is not paper. Sincerely, --<font face="Times New Roman">[[User:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles|<span style="color:#009">Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles|Tally-ho!]]''</sup> 02:40, 20 May 2008 (UTC) |
||
:::Are you trying to make a joke? I missed if you are, and if your not, Trivia encyclopedias prove nothing with regard to wikipeda policy. [[User:Judgesurreal777|Judgesurreal777]] ([[User talk:Judgesurreal777|talk]]) 03:49, 20 May 2008 (UTC) |
:::Are you trying to make a joke? I missed if you are, and if your not, Trivia encyclopedias prove nothing with regard to wikipeda policy. [[User:Judgesurreal777|Judgesurreal777]] ([[User talk:Judgesurreal777|talk]]) 03:49, 20 May 2008 (UTC) |
||
::::Wikipedia isn't paper is more of an excuse, than an actual reason. It's pretty clear the consensus is to delete the article. Le Grand, why are you posting that Amazon link more than once? People can see the link once, it doesn't need to be posted in two replies. [[User:RobJ1981|RobJ1981]] ([[User talk:RobJ1981|talk]]) 05:44, 20 May 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:44, 20 May 2008
List of Mario characters in other media
- List of Mario characters in other media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article asserts no notability through reliable sources, and is just a compilation of all the characters of various non-nintendo media featuring mario. That information belongs in the respective article, not listed here. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 01:35, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, no different from the "in popular culture" sections that have been deleted from Wikipedia articles. JIP | Talk 03:52, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. These characters should be listed, if at all, in the articles about the respective movies, television shows, or comics, not in this one collective article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:54, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- Strong keep per Wikipedia:Lists (discriminate and verifiable) and Wikipedia:Five pillars (consistent with a “specialized encyclopedia” concerning fictional topics with importance in the real world). Consistent with "in popular culture" articles that have been kept. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 05:14, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete I don't know what the lists wants to accomplish other than compiling trivial facts. I agree that if these characters are to be listed anywhere, they should be listed in the respective article for the medium, not in an all-encompassing list that adds no real value to the encyclopedia. – sgeureka t•c 13:57, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete the list and merge the information into relevant articles if reliable sources can be found. This is essentially a huge, unverified trivia section, and these are generally to be discouraged. RichardΩ612 Ɣ ɸ 15:30, May 17, 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:V and WP:PSTS, as it entirely lacks secondary sources (and sometimes even primary sources). Also, although the list may have defined inclusion criteria, there are a potentially infinite number of lists with defined inclusion criteria, and we have to consider whether the inclusion criteria are in fact meaningful and notable. In my view, this is merely a compilation of trivia. Hence, in my view, the page as a whole fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Jakew (talk) 16:22, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete An article on 'Mario in pop culture' is enough through cultural impact. Martarius (talk) 19:29, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Pure collection of trivia. Zero Kitsune (talk) 15:24, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
- Trivia is encyclopedic. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 19:39, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
- Trivia section are discouraged under Wikipedia guidelines. Zero Kitsune (talk) 02:29, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Some of which do not actually have consensus. Plus, the article does not even have "trivia" in it's title and nor is a section of a particular article. Thus, it is not a trivia section, but a discriminate list that demonstrates the notability of Mario characters by cataloging there appearances and use in other media. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 17:29, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Trivia section are discouraged under Wikipedia guidelines. Zero Kitsune (talk) 02:29, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Trivia is encyclopedic. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 19:39, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 00:45, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete too much trivia for me.-- danntm T C 01:35, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Trivia is encyclopedic and Wikipedia is not paper. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 02:40, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Are you trying to make a joke? I missed if you are, and if your not, Trivia encyclopedias prove nothing with regard to wikipeda policy. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 03:49, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Wikipedia isn't paper is more of an excuse, than an actual reason. It's pretty clear the consensus is to delete the article. Le Grand, why are you posting that Amazon link more than once? People can see the link once, it doesn't need to be posted in two replies. RobJ1981 (talk) 05:44, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Are you trying to make a joke? I missed if you are, and if your not, Trivia encyclopedias prove nothing with regard to wikipeda policy. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 03:49, 20 May 2008 (UTC)