Content deleted Content added
Robert K S (talk | contribs) |
Jimintheatl (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*'''Keep''' for the reasons enumerated above by Croc.--[[User:HughGRex|HughGRex]] ([[User talk:HughGRex|talk]]) 00:26, 28 May 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' for the reasons enumerated above by Croc.--[[User:HughGRex|HughGRex]] ([[User talk:HughGRex|talk]]) 00:26, 28 May 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' Trivial, non-encyclopedic. Merge, as a last resort.[[User:Jimintheatl|Jimintheatl]] ([[User talk:Jimintheatl|talk]]) 01:10, 28 May 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' Trivial, non-encyclopedic. Merge, as a last resort.[[User:Jimintheatl|Jimintheatl]] ([[User talk:Jimintheatl|talk]]) 01:10, 28 May 2008 (UTC) |
||
: Note to closing admin: [[User:Jimintheatl]] has demonstrated animosity toward me, as shown at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACroctotheface&diff=214059562&oldid=213848516 this diff] and at [[Talk:Criticism of Bill O'Reilly]]. This is quite likely just a case of stalking/agitating me. [[User:Croctotheface|Croctotheface]] ([[User talk:Croctotheface|talk]]) 01:37, 28 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep''' as the others said [[User:KnowitallWiki|Knowitall]] ([[User talk:KnowitallWiki|talk]]) 02:41, 28 May 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' as the others said [[User:KnowitallWiki|Knowitall]] ([[User talk:KnowitallWiki|talk]]) 02:41, 28 May 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:14, 28 May 2008
Larissa Kelly
- Larissa Kelly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Jeopardy contestant; fails WP:N / one-event notability. slakr\ talk / 22:44, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep as a record holder on the show who meets the baseline notability standard of coverage in multiple reliable sources. This is not just a run of the mill contestant on the show; she's the all time money leader among females and third all time in money winnings. Croctotheface (talk) 22:47, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Also, several other Jeopardy contestants--David Madden (Jeopardy! contestant), Frank Spangenberg, Jerome Vered, and arguably Eddie Timanus--all have articles that assert notability only for Jeopardy appearances. As far as merging, what's there now could be merged, I agree, but the article has existed for all of 10 minutes and could certainly be expanded. Croctotheface (talk) 23:00, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Merge to Jeopardy!. Borderline notability, this information could easily fit into the article on the game show. AniMate 22:53, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Notable certainly exists because she is the all-time leader among females, and third (as of 5 minutes ago) highest all-time in total. She just extended her streak by one show a few minutes ago, too. Gary King (talk) 00:02, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep for the reasons enumerated above by Croc.--HughGRex (talk) 00:26, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Trivial, non-encyclopedic. Merge, as a last resort.Jimintheatl (talk) 01:10, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep as the others said Knowitall (talk) 02:41, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- Not that it'd make any difference, but my vote would be Delete for now and recreate when she attains notability. I've been watching Jeopardy! with interest lately and I think she might achieve something more than just 3rd-best, but we'll see. JuJube (talk) 02:48, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep she has proven that by being the all time leader for female contestants she belongs. she has also become the third highest money winner and anyone not wanting her listed in jealousy.Ducatigary (talk) 02:56, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep All-time female champion is a sufficient claim to notability. She'd at least merit a mention somewhere, so outright deletion is unnecessary. Zagalejo^^^ 03:24, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep More and more, people have started garnering interest in Larissa. Larissa DOES show that she has the makings of a Jeopardy! champion (pardon flowery language) and lately people haven't been this interested in the show since Ken Jennings' appearance. And now she's won over $220,000, already on the show six times, a rarity in itself these days. Iamwisesun talk 21:14, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep If she wasn't the all-time winner for women. She is, so thats notable. rootology (T) 05:57, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, maybe The previously-discussed (but unofficial) guideline regarding notability of Jeopardy! contestants has been that only the record-holders deserve their own articles. Obviously, being a female record-holder is only a sub-distinction. At some point, one has to draw the line at creating new sub-distinctions; perhaps being a female record-holder is noteworthy, but is being a hispanic female record holder, e.g.? or senior citizen hispanic female record holder? etc. With sufficient dichotomization, any champion can be said to be a "record holder" amongst some classification group. Still, it would be reasonable to ask to let the article stay at least until Larissa's run has ended and the extent of her actual eventual notability is determined. Robert K S (talk) 07:39, 28 May 2008 (UTC)