Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:{{la|Charon in popular culture}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charon in popular culture|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 September 26#{{anchorencode:Charon in popular culture}}|View log]])</noinclude> |
:{{la|Charon in popular culture}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charon in popular culture|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 September 26#{{anchorencode:Charon in popular culture}}|View log]])</noinclude> |
||
'''Delete''' - [[WP:NOT#DIR|directory of loosely- and un-associated items]]. Seeks to capture any appearance of or reference to the mythical figure with no regard to the triviality of the appearance, along with [[WP:OR|originally researched]] 'may be based on' or 'resembles' entries and entries for things that are not the mythical figure but have the same name. Tells us nothing about Charon, nothing about the fiction from which the items are drawn, nothing about their (non-existent) relationship to each other and nothing about the real world. Oppose merging any of this to any other article about Charon as it is no less of a trivia collection in another article as it is on its own. [[User:Otto4711|Otto4711]] 15:08, 26 September 2007 (UTC) |
'''Delete''' - [[WP:NOT#DIR|directory of loosely- and un-associated items]]. Seeks to capture any appearance of or reference to the mythical figure with no regard to the triviality of the appearance, along with [[WP:OR|originally researched]] 'may be based on' or 'resembles' entries and entries for things that are not the mythical figure but have the same name. Tells us nothing about Charon, nothing about the fiction from which the items are drawn, nothing about their (non-existent) relationship to each other and nothing about the real world. Oppose merging any of this to any other article about Charon as it is no less of a trivia collection in another article as it is on its own. [[User:Otto4711|Otto4711]] 15:08, 26 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''- awfully written by no doubt spamming, academic authors, unsaveable.[[User:JJJ999|JJJ999]] 04:43, 27 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' do not merge. Simply not an encyclopedic topic, and the entries show it. [[User:MarkBul|MarkBul]] 16:39, 26 September 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' do not merge. Simply not an encyclopedic topic, and the entries show it. [[User:MarkBul|MarkBul]] 16:39, 26 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete per nom''' --[[User:Agamemnon2|Agamemnon2]] 16:39, 26 September 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Delete per nom''' --[[User:Agamemnon2|Agamemnon2]] 16:39, 26 September 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:43, 27 September 2007
Charon in popular culture
- Charon in popular culture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Delete - directory of loosely- and un-associated items. Seeks to capture any appearance of or reference to the mythical figure with no regard to the triviality of the appearance, along with originally researched 'may be based on' or 'resembles' entries and entries for things that are not the mythical figure but have the same name. Tells us nothing about Charon, nothing about the fiction from which the items are drawn, nothing about their (non-existent) relationship to each other and nothing about the real world. Oppose merging any of this to any other article about Charon as it is no less of a trivia collection in another article as it is on its own. Otto4711 15:08, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete- awfully written by no doubt spamming, academic authors, unsaveable.JJJ999 04:43, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete do not merge. Simply not an encyclopedic topic, and the entries show it. MarkBul 16:39, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Agamemnon2 16:39, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Just a list of trivial mentions, Charon is important, sure, that's why it has its own article. Every mythological figure has been mentioned a lot in "popular culture", but that does not mean it is a suitable page for an encyclopedia. Dannycali 19:06, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Wikipedia isn't a trivia guide. RobJ1981 19:07, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep list format demonstrates the extent of Charon's influence and impact on popular culture. Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia and so benefits from large numbers of articles. Add references, as always, but definitely keep. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 19:24, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree with the well-phrased rationales above (trivia, original research resemblance, and complete lack of context). --68.163.65.119 04:17, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep WP, as someone said once, makes the internet not suck. that includes organising references to notable characters and themes and assembling the information into articles. The article has been listed for rescue--Im glad to see that some of the people who are a little less ready to keep than I, think it a good candidate for improvement. Sure, it needs improvement., Most WP articles do. DGG (talk) 04:26, 27 September 2007 (UTC)