Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
::*'''Question'''- Why should we give you reviewer, which is completely for trying out a script, when you fail to follow directions well enough to place a request on this page correctly? You placed it under its own section header instead of the same way as everyone else. Administrators- if you disagree please tell ''me''. [[User:1234r00t|<span style='color:#383132'><i><u><b>Mr. R00t</b></u></i></span>]] [[User Talk:1234r00t| <span style="color:#46520C"><sup><u><i>Talk</i></u></sup></span>]] 03:05, 19 June 2010 (UTC) |
::*'''Question'''- Why should we give you reviewer, which is completely for trying out a script, when you fail to follow directions well enough to place a request on this page correctly? You placed it under its own section header instead of the same way as everyone else. Administrators- if you disagree please tell ''me''. [[User:1234r00t|<span style='color:#383132'><i><u><b>Mr. R00t</b></u></i></span>]] [[User Talk:1234r00t| <span style="color:#46520C"><sup><u><i>Talk</i></u></sup></span>]] 03:05, 19 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
:::*Plus you don't even do much vandal fighting. [[User:1234r00t|<span style='color:#383132'><i><u><b>Mr. R00t</b></u></i></span>]] [[User Talk:1234r00t| <span style="color:#46520C"><sup><u><i>Talk</i></u></sup></span>]] 03:06, 19 June 2010 (UTC) |
:::*Plus you don't even do much vandal fighting. [[User:1234r00t|<span style='color:#383132'><i><u><b>Mr. R00t</b></u></i></span>]] [[User Talk:1234r00t| <span style="color:#46520C"><sup><u><i>Talk</i></u></sup></span>]] 03:06, 19 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
====[[User:Ottre]]==== |
|||
*<span class="plainlinks">[[User:Ottre|{{ucfirst:Ottre}}]] · ([[User talk:Ottre|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Ottre|contribs]] · [[Special:DeletedContributions/Ottre|deleted]] · [[:luxo:Ottre|cross-wiki]] · {{ plainlink | url=http://en.wikichecker.com/user/?t={{urlencode:Ottre}}| name=wikichecker}}· [http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/count/index.php?name={{urlencode:{{ucfirst:Ottre}}}}&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia count] · {{ plainlink | url=http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/pages/index.php?name={{urlencode:Ottre}}&namespace=0&redirects=noredirects | name=pages created}} · [{{fullurl:Special:Log|user={{anchorencode:{{ucfirst:Ottre}}}}}} logs] · [{{fullurl:Special:Log/block|page=User:{{anchorencode:{{ucfirst:Ottre}}}}}} block log] · [{{fullurl:Special:Listusers|limit=1&username={{urlencode:{{ucfirst:Ottre}}}}}} lu] · [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{ucfirst:Ottre}}|rfar]] · [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/{{ucfirst:Ottre}}|rfc]] · [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/{{ucfirst:Ottre}}|rfcu]] · [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/{{ucfirst:Ottre}}|ssp]] · [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/{{ucfirst:Ottre}}|spi]] · [http://toolserver.org/~eagle/archivesearch.php?search=%28%5C%7B%5C%7B%5B%5E%5B%5D*%5C%7C%7C%5B%5E%7C%3A%2FA-Za-z0-9%5D%7C%5E%29{{urlencode:Ottre}}%5B%5EA-Za-z0-9%5D&useregex=1&where%5B%5D=enpedia_3rr&where%5B%5D=enpedia_an&where%5B%5D=enpedia_ani&where%5B%5D=enpedia_cn search an, ani, cn, an3]</span>) ([[Special:Userrights/Ottre|<span style="color:#002bb8">'''assign permissions'''</span>]]) |
|||
:Long-time editor. I used to spend an hour or so each day patrolling recent changes, then moved on to new pages patrol, and now do fact-checking for around five hours per week. In regards to the recent block for edit warring, I am convinced that the [[ABC Television]] program ''[[Lateline]]'' is a discussion forum, not news, and should not be used in BLPs. This matter has not been resolved, I will challenge the block soon. [[User:Ottre|Ottre]] 04:47, 19 June 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:47, 19 June 2010
Reviewer ()
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13 |
1 |
User:Goochelaar
- Goochelaar · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)
- Editor for a long time, rollbacker for some time, I like to give my small contribution to WP. [[::User:Goochelaar|Goochelaar]] ([[::User talk:Goochelaar|talk]]) 19:25, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Done--RegentsPark (talk) 19:46, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
User:Jimmy Pitt
- Jimmy Pitt · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)
- Autoreviewer with rollback privileges, occasionally active in vandal checking and disambiguation, have been a wikipedian for well over four years and would like to contribute further Jimmy Pitt (talk) 20:11, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Done--RegentsPark (talk) 21:36, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
User:Khfan93
- Khfan93 · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)
- Long-time member who has been in and out of wikipedia. Primarily I work to revert vandalism, so this would be an appropriate power. I will not be offended if I do not receive it, however. :) -khfan93 21:13, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Done Nakon 22:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
User:Arnoutf
- Arnoutf · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)
- Long time editor, familiar with policies, patrolling many pages for POV and other problematic edits trying to resolve without conflict. Arnoutf (talk) 21:23, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
On hold, Can you please explain your block log? Since the block was for edit warring, I'm a bit hesitant to assign the reviewer bit. Nakon 22:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Note this was a year ago. The situation was a case of clear and obvious and vandalising (POV pushing) thourh sockpuppeteering, by a sockpuppeteer (User:philscirel) with a long history on this specific article Fethullah Gulen. However the sockpuppetry case took 3 weeks (!!!) to be even looked at after which the sockpuppet was banned. While the sockpuppet procedure did not respond at all I kept reverting the sockpuppet (claiming his edits to be vandalism), but so did the sockpuppet with my reverts (i.e. claiming those as vandalism) and reported me for 3RR violation. Since the sockpuppet had basically prepared a completely different version of the article in some distant past , the vandalism of the sockpuppet was not very obviously vandalism for the admins who were not familiar with the history of the specific article. The patrolling admin blocked both me and the sockpuppet for a short while to restore rest. A little while later the sockpuppet was blocked (and reappeared a while later again and again, but that has nothing to with the case here).
- Indeed I may have overreacted to trolling of a repeating sockpuppeteer, this has learned me some restraint and just wait for the proper procedures (even if they take an absurd amount of time as in this case..... 3 full weeks to respond to a sockpuppet notification). Arnoutf (talk) 22:17, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Done Explanation seems reasonable. --RegentsPark (talk) 01:58, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
User:AussieLegend
- AussieLegend · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)
- Most of my work these days consists of vandalism reversions, MOS compliance, etc. AussieLegend (talk) 23:32, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:36, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
User:SatuSuro
already done- you were given the flag... by me... five days ago. Happy editing! Courcelles (talk) 23:58, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
- HOw embarassing - clearly not editing everyday without fail at the moment brings on the memory glitch :( SatuSuro 00:06, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
User:Zach425
- Zach425 · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)
- Long-time editor (though I often take a break for several months) who focuses in part on vandalism. —Zach425 talk/contribs 00:54, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Done 7 01:49, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
User:Joseph Svinth
- Joseph Svinth · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)
- Reason for requesting Reviewer rights I contributed to some of the entries on martial arts and combative sports, and the entries on wrestling and boxing get abused. Joseph Svinth (talk) 01:53, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
- Question- Why should we give you reviewer, which is completely for trying out a script, when you fail to follow directions well enough to place a request on this page correctly? You placed it under its own section header instead of the same way as everyone else. Administrators- if you disagree please tell me. Mr. R00t Talk 03:05, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
User:Ottre
- Ottre · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)
- Long-time editor. I used to spend an hour or so each day patrolling recent changes, then moved on to new pages patrol, and now do fact-checking for around five hours per week. In regards to the recent block for edit warring, I am convinced that the ABC Television program Lateline is a discussion forum, not news, and should not be used in BLPs. This matter has not been resolved, I will challenge the block soon. Ottre 04:47, 19 June 2010 (UTC)