BeanieFan11 (talk | contribs) r |
Therapyisgood (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*'''Endorse''' sound reasoning from 4meter4 in the discussion. [[User:Therapyisgood|Therapyisgood]] ([[User talk:Therapyisgood|talk]]) 02:16, 5 May 2023 (UTC) |
*'''Endorse''' sound reasoning from 4meter4 in the discussion. [[User:Therapyisgood|Therapyisgood]] ([[User talk:Therapyisgood|talk]]) 02:16, 5 May 2023 (UTC) |
||
*: The same "sound reasoning" that nearly ''everybody'' disagreed with in the other discussion... [[User:BeanieFan11|BeanieFan11]] ([[User talk:BeanieFan11|talk]]) 02:29, 5 May 2023 (UTC) |
*: The same "sound reasoning" that nearly ''everybody'' disagreed with in the other discussion... [[User:BeanieFan11|BeanieFan11]] ([[User talk:BeanieFan11|talk]]) 02:29, 5 May 2023 (UTC) |
||
*::Cry harder about it. [[User:Therapyisgood|Therapyisgood]] ([[User talk:Therapyisgood|talk]]) 02:49, 5 May 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:49, 5 May 2023
4 May 2023
1991–92 Kilmarnock F.C. season
- 1991–92 Kilmarnock F.C. season (talk||history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)
I feel that this discussion should be relisted. It is a near-identical case with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1987–88 Kilmarnock F.C. season (the only real difference is pretty much the year), which received much more participation and had a clear consensus to keep (FWIW, this one had six !votes, 2k-4d, while the other had thirteen !votes, 10k-3d - or 10k-2d if you exclude a sock). The 91-92 article included references and book sources for nearly every single game, many of which were of the same length and quality compared to the other (and if I remember correctly, the book sources were the same). Pinging those who have commented on both this and the 1987-88 discussion: @Onel5969, Hytrgpzxct, GiantSnowman, Spiderone, 4meter4, Phil Bridger, Cbl62, JoelleJay, BruceThomson, Das osmnezz, Alvaldi, TimothyBlue, Paradise Chronicle, Rupples, KatoKungLee, Stevie fae Scotland, and Frank Anchor: (minus one sock) BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:17, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Endorse - the other example given, if based on policy and not simple vote-counting would also have been delete. Nothing wrong with this close.Onel5969 TT me 01:10, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- You think that all of the keeps in both discussions were non-policy based? BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:13, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Endorse sound reasoning from 4meter4 in the discussion. Therapyisgood (talk) 02:16, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- The same "sound reasoning" that nearly everybody disagreed with in the other discussion... BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:29, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Cry harder about it. Therapyisgood (talk) 02:49, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- The same "sound reasoning" that nearly everybody disagreed with in the other discussion... BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:29, 5 May 2023 (UTC)