Content deleted Content added
r |
The Herald (talk | contribs) →Inshorts: Closed as keep (XFDcloser) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
|||
<!--Template:Afd top |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result was '''keep'''__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Closing as keep since sources indicating notability are present, which can be incorporated into the article and can be used for further expansion. <small>[[Wikipedia:NACD|(non-admin closure)]]</small> [[User:The Herald|The Herald (Benison)]] ([[User talk:The Herald|talk]]) 12:39, 1 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
===[[:Inshorts]]=== |
===[[:Inshorts]]=== |
||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}} |
|||
<div class="other-afds" style="width:33%; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #f8f9fa; color: black; margin: 0.5em 0 0.5em 1em; padding: 0.2em; float: right; clear: right; font-size: 88%; min-width:20em; max-width: 100%">AfDs for this article: |
<div class="other-afds" style="width:33%; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #f8f9fa; color: black; margin: 0.5em 0 0.5em 1em; padding: 0.2em; float: right; clear: right; font-size: 88%; min-width:20em; max-width: 100%">AfDs for this article: |
||
{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inshorts}} |
{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inshorts}} |
||
Line 16: | Line 22: | ||
*:I also missed that source. However, five days later, nobody has added content related to it, or included it as a reference, and we still only have a seven-sentence stub with five references used to cite the names of three personnel, and five more referring only to VC funding rounds, leaving three for the actual company. As it stands, sure, the company's app ''may'' well be hugely popular in India - but that's not in the article, either. Notability is ''not'' demonstrated. [[User:Bastun|<span style="font-family:Verdana, sans-serif">Bastun</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Bastun|Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!]]</sup> 15:15, 30 March 2024 (UTC) |
*:I also missed that source. However, five days later, nobody has added content related to it, or included it as a reference, and we still only have a seven-sentence stub with five references used to cite the names of three personnel, and five more referring only to VC funding rounds, leaving three for the actual company. As it stands, sure, the company's app ''may'' well be hugely popular in India - but that's not in the article, either. Notability is ''not'' demonstrated. [[User:Bastun|<span style="font-family:Verdana, sans-serif">Bastun</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Bastun|Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!]]</sup> 15:15, 30 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
*'''keep''' per AusLondonder. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] ([[User talk:JoshuaZ|talk]]) 20:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC) |
*'''keep''' per AusLondonder. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] ([[User talk:JoshuaZ|talk]]) 20:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
{{clear}} |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
Latest revision as of 12:39, 1 April 2024
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Closing as keep since sources indicating notability are present, which can be incorporated into the article and can be used for further expansion. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 12:39, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Inshorts
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Inshorts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Re-created article, twice deleted previously for not meeting WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Five references are used to cite the names of three personnel. Five more refer only to to VC funding rounds, leaving three for the actual company. Fails WP:SIGCOV and still doesn't meet WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 11:55, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Sources fail to establish WP:GNG as per nom. Velella Velella Talk 12:23, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral for now.
Delete. No WP:CORPDEPTH present in the sources.—Alalch E. 13:46, 25 March 2024 (UTC) - Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, India, and Uttar Pradesh. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:09, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Websites. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:41, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep This AfD has reminded me of the importance of looking for sources, not relying on just those present in the article before forming an opinion and also why previous AfDs are not always relevant. Inshorts appears to have been the subject of an entire chapter in Digital First: Entrepreneurial Journalism in India, published in 2023 by Oxford University Press. This is perfect coverage per WP:CORPDEPTH: "Deep or significant coverage provides an overview, description, commentary, survey, study, discussion, analysis, or evaluation of the...company." There's also some interesting coverage published by the World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers. Coverage also from the Business Standard adds to the sense of general notability, and this is without searching in any of the many other languages of India. It appears to be one of the most-popular news apps in the world's most populous country (a democracy with a competitive news business). Find it hard to imagine a comparable American or British company being nominated for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 20:00, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. I always look for sources but that OUP source is something I did not find. I will see about expanding the article using it. —Alalch E. 22:44, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- I also missed that source. However, five days later, nobody has added content related to it, or included it as a reference, and we still only have a seven-sentence stub with five references used to cite the names of three personnel, and five more referring only to VC funding rounds, leaving three for the actual company. As it stands, sure, the company's app may well be hugely popular in India - but that's not in the article, either. Notability is not demonstrated. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 15:15, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- keep per AusLondonder. JoshuaZ (talk) 20:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.