→ZuluPapa5's battlefield conduct: evidence |
Tony Sidaway (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
*When I can realize the difference between dispute resolution and battlefield conduct, I'll be better off. Seems like a hypocrite maliciously threw my few bad diffs, into an unforgiving environment. Such is karma, where all is there for the picking, under bad faith intentions. [[User:ZuluPapa5|Zulu Papa 5 *]] ([[User talk:ZuluPapa5#top|talk]]) 04:08, 16 October 2010 (UTC) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ZuluPapa5&curid=14620623&diff=391003459&oldid=391003265] |
*When I can realize the difference between dispute resolution and battlefield conduct, I'll be better off. Seems like a hypocrite maliciously threw my few bad diffs, into an unforgiving environment. Such is karma, where all is there for the picking, under bad faith intentions. [[User:ZuluPapa5|Zulu Papa 5 *]] ([[User talk:ZuluPapa5#top|talk]]) 04:08, 16 October 2010 (UTC) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ZuluPapa5&curid=14620623&diff=391003459&oldid=391003265] |
||
==[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification#Request_for_clarification:_Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration.2FClimate_change]]== |
|||
This is formal notification because you are one of the affected parties. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|TS]] 00:28, 24 October 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:28, 24 October 2010
Please sign (~~~~) before you save. Beware SineBot!
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e3/DEU_Wurmlingen_COA.svg/220px-DEU_Wurmlingen_COA.svg.png)
“In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual.”
Within a Bayesian psychometric analysis, I am 110% certain that humankind is solely responsible for climate change; because, if not by material activity, then by conscious opinion manifesting as science.
— ZP5
Forgive me, Nihilism by its lonely sad self aggrandizement, causes illness to exist in me. For real, it exists that way. Happily, there is a cure.
— ZP5
"Human beings are selfish, small minded, violence-prone savages; civilization is a blight on the earth; the rising tide of chaos that surrounds us on all sides ensures that everything's going to fall apart any day now. Right? ..... Wrong, says Rob Brezsny. In fact evil is boring. Cynicism is stupid. Despair is lazy. The truth is that the universe is inherently our friend. Life is a sublime game created for our amusement and illumination, and it always gives us exactly what we need, exactly when we need it."
" ... in modern mechanized warfare there is no warrior, no chance to be a warrior (with dignity), just little human boys in different uniforms ... so what Bly went on to say is that most men in this country cannot grieve, cannot experience grief! Good Grief Charlie Brown! ... Now the crux of the matter as Bly sees it and as my father saw it and Spiritual God-Father Mr A. Green, the full blooded Cherokee tattoo artist who lived in the apt next door for my first 13 yrs ... The heart of the matter has to do with the "warrior" in themselves. This "warrior" is not the one who goes to war. No this "warrior" is the one who goes through life with a quiet goal and sees it through "Come hell or high water" to use an apt a phrase."
— Father to ZP5, 8/23/1990
"Within the body of a True Believer or a Skeptic you will find a heart that may unite them. "
— Zulu Papa 5 ☆ (talk) 18:05, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
My editing occasionally suffers from transpositions
transportationand typos. I apologize if I have confused you. Please let me know if you suspect this to be an issue.— ZuluPapa5
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following is a summary of the remedies enacted:
- A specially-tailored version of discretionary sanctions is authorized for the entire topic area of climate change. Enforcement requests are to be submitted to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement, which is to replace Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation/Requests for enforcement.
- Experienced administrators, and especially checkusers, are requested to closely monitor new accounts that edit inappropriately in the topic area.
- Within seven days of this remedy passing, all parties must either delete evidence sub-pages or request deletion of them.
- The following editors are banned from the topic area of climate change, and may not appeal this ban until at least six months after the closure of this case (and no more often than every three months thereafter);
- The following users have accepted binding voluntary topic bans;
- The following administrators are explicitly restricted from applying discretionary sanctions as authorized in this case, as is any other administrator fitting the description of an involved administrator;
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee,
Dougweller (talk) 18:10, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Obviously, WMC lead the way to this mayhem. What a laggard I have been. Zulu Papa 5 * (talk) 03:48, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
ZuluPapa5's battlefield conduct
24) ZuluPapa5 (talk · contribs) has in the run-up to this case helped create a battlefield atmosphere by engaging in edit-warring;[3][4][5][6] by engaging in incivility and personal attacks;[7][8][9] and by seemingly wiki-lawyering and/or soapboxing.[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]
- Passed 7 to 0, 14:10, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- When I can realize the difference between dispute resolution and battlefield conduct, I'll be better off. Seems like a hypocrite maliciously threw my few bad diffs, into an unforgiving environment. Such is karma, where all is there for the picking, under bad faith intentions. Zulu Papa 5 * (talk) 04:08, 16 October 2010 (UTC) [18]
This is formal notification because you are one of the affected parties. --TS 00:28, 24 October 2010 (UTC)