WaitingForConnection (talk | contribs) →Italian orders of knighthood: new section |
|||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
::OK, but obey the rules.--[[User:Yopie|Yopie]] ([[User talk:Yopie#top|talk]]) 21:44, 19 January 2010 (UTC) |
::OK, but obey the rules.--[[User:Yopie|Yopie]] ([[User talk:Yopie#top|talk]]) 21:44, 19 January 2010 (UTC) |
||
== [[Italian orders of knighthood]] == |
|||
Hi there. I noticed that there was a bit of a content dispute on this list a week or so ago. As part of its [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Italian orders of knighthood/archive1|featured list candidacy]], I just wanted to check whether dispute is now resolved, or if you feel the content is incorrect? Regards, [[User:WFCforLife|WFCforLife]] ([[User talk:WFCforLife|talk]]) 20:37, 21 January 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:37, 21 January 2010
Slovak declaration of independence 1939
Dear Yopie, I'm starting to consider your position of Czechoslovakia more valid the more I think about it, meaning legal continuity of CZ. One question is, how should Wikipedia treat events like the "Slovak declaration of independence 1939", should Wikipedia write that it legally didn't happen, was legally non-possible etc? And what about existence of 1939 Slovakia, we have very many articles discussing 1939 Slovakia and none of them mention that legally CZ continued to exist. Should these be re-written to reflect the fact that existence of 1939 Slovakia was illegal (if CZ was legal instead) ? Hobartimus (talk) 03:46, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
This idea is not true, must be removed
If you are not well informed in that matter, please don't edit about it. You mentioned dynastic union, but now you say personal union, these are not the same, you don't know your exact statement. However, there was no any type of union, Hungary conquered Croatia. Maybe your very nice Czech encyclopedia says union, but books of Cambridge University Press and Oxford University Press say that there was no union, but Hungarian conquest. Accept that and don't readd again the wrong information. Toroko (talk) 18:59, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Page 267 in the first and page 186 in the second book. You can search for the important words as well. Toroko (talk) 17:29, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Full titles
Hello Yopie I am suggesting that either the full title of a king/emporer should go into the lead or stick to the abreviated title. Somewhere in between the two is just a mess. Polargeo (talk) 09:06, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Almanchdegotha
I noticed that you have been migrating from adg.org to other sites, it looks like these aren't terribly RS like either, being free hosting sites. Maybe http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=almanach+de+gotha%20AND%20mediatype%3Atexts might provide better refernces? Maybe they could be put on Wikisource? Rich Farmbrough, 03:24, 14 December 2009 (UTC).
Hello. Please stop adding a F10 speedy deletion ({{db-badfiletype}}) tag to File:Flag of Eastland.pdf. The file does not qualify for deletion under WP:CSD#F10. If you want to see the file deleted, please go to WP:FFD. I understand you're trying to help but please don't keep adding speedy tags to File:Flag of Eastland.pdf when they are not applicable. -FASTILY (TALK) 23:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, but file is bad filetype and is not used in any article. Clearly for speed deletion. --Yopie (talk) 23:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
User pages intrusion etc.
Thanks for your comments. There are many valid references on Križevci and Dobor massacres; I keep bumping into those all the time. Secondly, what's the point of [[]] bracketing in Wikipedia if it can be interpreted negatively, as self-referencing? So I think a bit of self-censorship when applying rules and regulations is in order here. I understand you are a lawyer, but you should know what I'm talking about even better. The purpose of regulations is to make life easier, not impossible. On your last point, I didn't move anything to my user space; I started a new page in my user space, rather. So I don't know why you were intruding into my user space and editing my personal files? Are you sure that regulations allow you to do that? Thanks for your useful contributions though. Bosnipedian (talk) 16:15, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- OK thanks for clarification. My intention was not to use Wikipedia as a free host, as there are millions of free-hosting services for that, not to mention blogs. I would appreciate if you from now on stayed away from my personal space. Thanks. Bosnipedian (talk) 21:13, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi there. I noticed that there was a bit of a content dispute on this list a week or so ago. As part of its featured list candidacy, I just wanted to check whether dispute is now resolved, or if you feel the content is incorrect? Regards, WFCforLife (talk) 20:37, 21 January 2010 (UTC)